State Through Police Station Wadod Bazar vs Samadhan Gautam Kharat — 771/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAU110015482025
Filing Number
1234/2025
Filing Date
08-12-2025
Registration No
771/2025
Registration Date
08-12-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Phulambri
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Phulambri
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
FIR Details
FIR Number
292
Police Station
Wadod Bazar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Through Police Station Wadod Bazar
Respondent(s)
Samadhan Gautam Kharat
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Phulambri
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 11-12-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 771/2025 Samadhan Gautam Kharat, age 28, was charged under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for operating an Eko vehicle (bearing no. MH-05-EA-8031) on a public way on 30/10/2025 that caused danger, obstruction, or injury to persons. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Phulambri on 14/03/2026. The court convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 300, with a default provision of 2 days simple imprisonment, citing the nature of the offense and the accused's plea for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 771/2025 Samadhan Gautam Kharat, age 28, was charged under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for operating an Eko vehicle (bearing no. MH-05-EA-8031) on a public way on 30/10/2025 that caused danger, obstruction, or injury to persons. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Phulambri on 14/03/2026. The court convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 300, with a default provision of 2 days simple imprisonment, citing the nature of the offense and the accused's plea for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts