State of Maharashtra vs Sominath Sahebrao Jadhav — 585/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAU110013772023
Filing Number
1176/2023
Filing Date
30-Nov-2023
Registration No
585/2023
Registration Date
02-Dec-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Phulambri
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
374
Police Station
Phulambri
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sominath Sahebrao Jadhav
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate First Class dismissed the case against accused Sominath Sahebrao Jadhav under section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act after over two years of pendency, citing the prosecution's failure to produce the chemical analyzer report within a reasonable timeframe. The court invoked section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to stop proceedings, finding that prosecution would serve no purpose without critical evidence, and ordered the accused's release with bail bond cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
12-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
08-Aug-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
29-Jan-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
12-Nov-2024
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
11-Jul-2024
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
29-Apr-2024
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
07-Dec-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Nov-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 585/2023
The Judicial Magistrate First Class dismissed the case against accused Sominath Sahebrao Jadhav under section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act after over two years of pendency, citing the prosecution's failure to produce the chemical analyzer report within a reasonable timeframe. The court invoked section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to stop proceedings, finding that prosecution would serve no purpose without critical evidence, and ordered the accused's release with bail bond cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts