Maharashtra Gramin Bank Branch Babra vs Kashinath Lahanu Rautray — 486/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Appearance Next hearing 25-Jun-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU110009172025

e-Filing Number

29-07-2025

Filing Number

727/2025

Filing Date

29-Jul-2025

Registration No

486/2025

Registration Date

01-Aug-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Phulambri

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Phulambri

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maharashtra Gramin Bank Branch Babra

    Adv. DHAKRE SANDIP KESHARLAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kashinath Lahanu Rautray

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  3. 13-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  4. 16-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  5. 07-Aug-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: SCC 486/2025 - Maharashtra Gramin Bank vs. Kashinath Rautray The court issued process and summons against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for cheque dishonour. The court found prima facie that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt, was dishonoured, and the accused failed to pay within 15 days of receiving the demand notice, establishing all essential ingredients of the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 07-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 29-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 486/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: SCC 486/2025 - Maharashtra Gramin Bank vs. Kashinath Rautray The court issued process and summons against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for cheque dishonour. The court found prima facie that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt, was dishonoured, and the accused failed to pay within 15 days of receiving the demand notice, establishing all essential ingredients of the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case