Rustamsing Jalamsing Rajput vs Ramdas Asaram Jadhav Advocate - Sonwane N.B. — 116/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU110008302024
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
e-Filing Number
21-07-2024
Filing Number
205/2024
Filing Date
23-07-2024
Registration No
116/2024
Registration Date
25-07-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Phulambri
Judge
1-Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Phulambri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rustamsing Jalamsing Rajput
Adv. Gaikwad S.S.
Respondent(s)
Ramdas Asaram Jadhav Advocate - Sonwane N.B.
Ganesh Ramdas Jadhav
Yogesh Ramdas Jadhav
Hausabai Ramdas Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Phulambri
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 17-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 08-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 116/2024 This is a civil dispute case involving property and family matters related to well-digging rights on agricultural land (Plot No. 455). Petitioner Rustamsing Jalamsing Rajput disputes claims made by Respondents Ramdas Asaram Jadhav and others regarding unauthorized well construction and water supply arrangements. The court heard testimony from both parties regarding alleged fraudulent power-of-attorney documents, property disputes, and claims of monetary transactions. The case was adjourned for further hearing on a subsequent date to allow completion of cross-examination and final submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 116/2024 This is a civil dispute case involving property and family matters related to well-digging rights on agricultural land (Plot No. 455). Petitioner Rustamsing Jalamsing Rajput disputes claims made by Respondents Ramdas Asaram Jadhav and others regarding unauthorized well construction and water supply arrangements. The court heard testimony from both parties regarding alleged fraudulent power-of-attorney documents, property disputes, and claims of monetary transactions. The case was adjourned for further hearing on a subsequent date to allow completion of cross-examination and final submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts