State of Maharashtra vs Shesherao Vinayak Mule — 267/2021

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU110005592021

Filing Number

481/2021

Filing Date

01-Jun-2021

Registration No

267/2021

Registration Date

01-Jun-2021

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Phulambri

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

54

Police Station

Wadod Bazar

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shesherao Vinayak Mule

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sheshrao Vinayak Mule (267/2021) The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC and discharged accused Sheshrao Vinayak Mule of charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The case, pending over 4 years with the accused absconding despite NBW issuance and prosecution failing to secure his presence, met the "special circumstances" criterion established in *Mulchand Raka v. State of Maharashtra*. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon the accused's arrest or surrender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  4. 22-Dec-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  5. 24-Sep-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  6. 18-Aug-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  7. 26-Jun-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  8. 06-May-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  9. 26-Mar-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  10. 07-Feb-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  11. 07-Dec-2024

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  12. 09-Oct-2024

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  13. 26-Jul-2024

    B.W._Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  14. 14-May-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  15. 13-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  16. 03-Jan-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  17. 12-Oct-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  18. 16-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  19. 20-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  20. 22-May-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  21. 13-Mar-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  22. 28-Dec-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  23. 12-Oct-2022

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  24. 25-Jul-2022

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  25. 11-May-2022

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  26. 21-Jan-2022

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  27. 06-Oct-2021

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  28. 20-Jul-2021

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri

  29. 04-Jun-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 01-Jun-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 267/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sheshrao Vinayak Mule (267/2021) The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC and discharged accused Sheshrao Vinayak Mule of charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The case, pending over 4 years with the accused absconding despite NBW issuance and prosecution failing to secure his presence, met the "special circumstances" criterion established in *Mulchand Raka v. State of Maharashtra*. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings upon the accused's arrest or surrender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case