Akil Shaikh Ayyub vs State Through Police Station Phulambri — 34/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 28th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU110003402026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

265/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

34/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Phulambri

Judge

1-Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Phulambri

Decision Date

28th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

56

Police Station

Phulambri

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Akil Shaikh Ayyub

Adv. Qureshi A.H.

Respondent(s)

State Through Police Station Phulambri

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Phulambri

28-03-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

Order on Exh

24-03-2026

Order on Exh

23-03-2026

Order on Exh

18-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

28-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Akil Shaikh Ayyub v. State (Case 34/2026) The court allowed the applicant's petition to release a seized Mahindra Bolero pickup truck on a supurnama (personal bond) of Rs. 5 lakhs with surety, despite the vehicle being used in illegal cattle transportation. The court held that while a prima facie case of animal cruelty exists, retaining the vehicle served no purpose as investigation was largely complete and prolonged detention would cause deterioration. However, the court imposed stringent conditions: the applicant cannot dispose of or alter the vehicle's identity, must produce it as directed, and the vehicle remains security for all animal care costs under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Rules, 2017. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Akil Shaikh Ayyub v. State (Case 34/2026) The court allowed the applicant's petition to release a seized Mahindra Bolero pickup truck on a supurnama (personal bond) of Rs. 5 lakhs with surety, despite the vehicle being used in illegal cattle transportation. The court held that while a prima facie case of animal cruelty exists, retaining the vehicle served no purpose as investigation was largely complete and prolonged detention would cause deterioration. However, the court imposed stringent conditions: the applicant cannot dispose of or alter the vehicle's identity, must produce it as directed, and the vehicle remains security for all animal care costs under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Rules, 2017. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Phulambri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case