Ganesh Ramdas Gaikwad vs State Through Police Station Phulambri — 33/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU110003362026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

262/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

33/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Phulambri

Judge

1-Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Phulambri

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

90

Police Station

Phulambri

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Ganesh Ramdas Gaikwad

Adv. Shaikh Shambaj A.

Respondent(s)

State Through Police Station Phulambri

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Phulambri

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Reply/Say

09-03-2026

Reply/Say

07-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Ganesh Ramdas Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra (33/2026) The court allowed the petitioner's application to release his seized tractor and trailer (registered under Section 303(2) B.N.S. in an illegal sand excavation case) from police custody into interim custody. The court ordered release upon execution of an ₹8,00,000 indemnity bond and strict conditions: the applicant must produce the vehicle as required by court, cannot sell or alter it until trial conclusion, and must submit vehicle documents and identity proof to police. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent holding that prolonged retention of seized vehicles at police stations serves no purpose and magistrates should release them with appropriate bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ganesh Ramdas Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra (33/2026) The court allowed the petitioner's application to release his seized tractor and trailer (registered under Section 303(2) B.N.S. in an illegal sand excavation case) from police custody into interim custody. The court ordered release upon execution of an ₹8,00,000 indemnity bond and strict conditions: the applicant must produce the vehicle as required by court, cannot sell or alter it until trial conclusion, and must submit vehicle documents and identity proof to police. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent holding that prolonged retention of seized vehicles at police stations serves no purpose and magistrates should release them with appropriate bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Phulambri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case