Ganesh Ramdas Gaikwad vs State Through Police Station Phulambri — 33/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU110003362026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
262/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
33/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Phulambri
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
90
Police Station
Phulambri
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ganesh Ramdas Gaikwad
Adv. Shaikh Shambaj A.
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Through Police Station Phulambri
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Ganesh Ramdas Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra (33/2026) The court allowed the petitioner's application to release his seized tractor and trailer (registered under Section 303(2) B.N.S. in an illegal sand excavation case) from police custody into interim custody. The court ordered release upon execution of an ₹8,00,000 indemnity bond and strict conditions: the applicant must produce the vehicle as required by court, cannot sell or alter it until trial conclusion, and must submit vehicle documents and identity proof to police. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent holding that prolonged retention of seized vehicles at police stations serves no purpose and magistrates should release them with appropriate bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
12-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
09-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 33/2026
Case Summary: Ganesh Ramdas Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra (33/2026) The court allowed the petitioner's application to release his seized tractor and trailer (registered under Section 303(2) B.N.S. in an illegal sand excavation case) from police custody into interim custody. The court ordered release upon execution of an ₹8,00,000 indemnity bond and strict conditions: the applicant must produce the vehicle as required by court, cannot sell or alter it until trial conclusion, and must submit vehicle documents and identity proof to police. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent holding that prolonged retention of seized vehicles at police stations serves no purpose and magistrates should release them with appropriate bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts