Maroti S/o Vithoba Gadekar vs Raibhan S/o Rama Gadekar — 28/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU110001832023
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
36/2023
Filing Date
14-02-2023
Registration No
28/2023
Registration Date
14-02-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Phulambri
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Phulambri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maroti S/o Vithoba Gadekar
Adv. Gaikwad S.S.
Respondent(s)
Raibhan S/o Rama Gadekar
Parvatabai W/o Vishnu Gadekar
Raghunath S/o Govinda Gadekar
Bhaguba S/o Govinda Gadekar
Sushiabai W/o Rajaram Gadekar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Phulambri
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 21-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 28/2023 Maroti S/o Vithoba Gadekar v. Raibhan S/o Rama Gadekar and Others Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court ruled that the petitioner (Maroti) failed to establish the three essential elements required for temporary injunction relief. The court found that the petitioner lacked prima facie rights to the disputed land and could not demonstrate irreparable harm warranting judicial intervention. Consequently, the interim order (Order 5) is vacated and the case stands dismissed with each party bearing its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 28/2023 Maroti S/o Vithoba Gadekar v. Raibhan S/o Rama Gadekar and Others Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court ruled that the petitioner (Maroti) failed to establish the three essential elements required for temporary injunction relief. The court found that the petitioner lacked prima facie rights to the disputed land and could not demonstrate irreparable harm warranting judicial intervention. Consequently, the interim order (Order 5) is vacated and the case stands dismissed with each party bearing its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts