State of Maharashtra through Inspector, State Excise C Division Kannad vs Satish Ashok Jaiswal Advocate - Shaikh Shambaj A. — 22/2020
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 (D). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAU110000352020
Filing Number
32/2020
Filing Date
07-Jan-2020
Registration No
22/2020
Registration Date
07-Jan-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Phulambri
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through Inspector, State Excise C Division Kannad
Respondent(s)
-
1.Satish Ashok Jaiswal Advocate - Shaikh Shambaj A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of Cr.P.C. and discharged accused Satish Ashok Jaiswal of offences under Section 65(d) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing that the case had been pending for over 5 years with the accused absconding and witnesses unavailable. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings if the accused is arrested or his presence secured with justifiable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
24-Jun-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
28-Apr-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
04-Mar-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
05-Feb-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
06-Dec-2024
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
16-Oct-2024
N.B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
28-Aug-2024
N.B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
24-Jul-2024
N.B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
28-May-2024
N.B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
05-Apr-2024
N.B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
07-Feb-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
06-Dec-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
02-Sep-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
10-Jul-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
14-Jun-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
03-Apr-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
04-Mar-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
11-Jan-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
07-Nov-2022
Appearance
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
02-Sep-2022
Appearance
Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
13-Jun-2022
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
22-Mar-2022
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
27-Nov-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
18-Oct-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
12-Aug-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
16-Jun-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
25-Mar-2021
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
09-Dec-2020
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
07-Sep-2020
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
21-Jul-2020
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
16-May-2020
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
18-Apr-2020
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
04-Apr-2020
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
21-Jan-2020
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
21-Jan-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jan-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 22/2020
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of Cr.P.C. and discharged accused Satish Ashok Jaiswal of offences under Section 65(d) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing that the case had been pending for over 5 years with the accused absconding and witnesses unavailable. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings if the accused is arrested or his presence secured with justifiable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts