State of Maharashtra through Inspector, State Excise C Division Kannad vs Satish Ashok Jaiswal Advocate - Shaikh Shambaj A. — 22/2020
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 (D). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAU110000352020
Filing Number
32/2020
Filing Date
07-01-2020
Registration No
22/2020
Registration Date
07-01-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Phulambri
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Phulambri
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through Inspector, State Excise C Division Kannad
Respondent(s)
Satish Ashok Jaiswal Advocate - Shaikh Shambaj A.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Phulambri
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 06-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 09-09-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of Cr.P.C. and discharged accused Satish Ashok Jaiswal of offences under Section 65(d) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing that the case had been pending for over 5 years with the accused absconding and witnesses unavailable. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings if the accused is arrested or his presence secured with justifiable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of Cr.P.C. and discharged accused Satish Ashok Jaiswal of offences under Section 65(d) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing that the case had been pending for over 5 years with the accused absconding and witnesses unavailable. The prosecution retains liberty to revive proceedings if the accused is arrested or his presence secured with justifiable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts