State of Maharashtra vs Madhav Sudam Meghawate — 358/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU100011302023

Filing Number

766/2023

Filing Date

14-Dec-2023

Registration No

358/2023

Registration Date

14-Dec-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad

Judge

1-Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

405

Police Station

Khultabad

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Madhav Sudam Meghawate

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court stopped proceedings against Madhav Sudam Meghawate under Section 258 CrPC due to prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite multiple opportunities, despite charges under Section 65(E) of Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The accused was discharged and seized contraband (Muddemal) was ordered disposed to the Superintendent of State Excise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad

  4. 12-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad

  5. 06-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.

  6. 11-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.

  7. 26-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.

  8. 26-Apr-2024

    Appearance

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.

  9. 04-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 14-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 358/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings against Madhav Sudam Meghawate under Section 258 CrPC due to prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite multiple opportunities, despite charges under Section 65(E) of Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The accused was discharged and seized contraband (Muddemal) was ordered disposed to the Superintendent of State Excise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case