State of Maharashtra vs Prakash Sakharam Avhad — 348/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12A. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAU100011202023
Filing Number
756/2023
Filing Date
14-Dec-2023
Registration No
348/2023
Registration Date
14-Dec-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad
Judge
1-Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
243
Police Station
Khultabad
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
-
1.Prakash Sakharam Avhad
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court stopped proceedings against accused Prakash Sakharam Avhad under Section 12(A) of the Prevention of Gambling Act and discharged him, as the prosecution failed to secure his presence despite sufficient opportunities despite the case being pending for long. Seized property (Rs. 980 and valueless items) was ordered to be credited to government and disposed per rules after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
06-Jan-2026
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
07-Jul-2025
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
08-Nov-2024
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
26-Jul-2024
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
25-Apr-2024
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
14-Mar-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
02-Jan-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Dec-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 348/2023
The court stopped proceedings against accused Prakash Sakharam Avhad under Section 12(A) of the Prevention of Gambling Act and discharged him, as the prosecution failed to secure his presence despite sufficient opportunities despite the case being pending for long. Seized property (Rs. 980 and valueless items) was ordered to be credited to government and disposed per rules after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts