State of Maharashtra vs Amol Sanjay Shendage — 346/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAU100011162023
Filing Number
752/2023
Filing Date
12-Dec-2023
Registration No
346/2023
Registration Date
12-Dec-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad
Judge
1-Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
503
Police Station
Khultabad
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
-
1.Amol Sanjay Shendage
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court stopped proceedings against accused Amol Sanjay Shendage under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to the prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite adequate opportunities, rendering continued adjournment futile. The accused was discharged of the offense under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, and seized contraband was ordered disposed to the State Excise Superintendent after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
08-Jan-2026
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
08-Jul-2025
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
09-Dec-2024
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
14-Aug-2024
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
12-Jun-2024
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
18-Apr-2024
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
01-Apr-2024
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
12-Dec-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Dec-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 346/2023
The court stopped proceedings against accused Amol Sanjay Shendage under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to the prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite adequate opportunities, rendering continued adjournment futile. The accused was discharged of the offense under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, and seized contraband was ordered disposed to the State Excise Superintendent after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts