Jijabai Asaram Bomble vs Eknath Kisan Dangorde — 96/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 with 151. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU100010112025

Issues

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

01-10-2025

Filing Number

305/2025

Filing Date

04-10-2025

Registration No

96/2025

Registration Date

06-10-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad

Judge

1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC KHULTABAD

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 with 151

Petitioner(s)

Jijabai Asaram Bomble

Adv. PURI SHIVAPRASAD DEVIDAS

Respondent(s)

Eknath Kisan Dangorde

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC KHULTABAD

12-03-2026

Issues

06-03-2026

Hearing

16-02-2026

Hearing

19-01-2026

Hearing

08-01-2026

Hearing

Interim Orders

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 96/2025 Petitioner: Jijabai Asaram Bomble Respondent: Eknath Kisan Dangorde Court: Khultabad, Maharashtra Date: 12/03/2026 Outcome: The petition was ALLOWED. The court granted the petitioner's application for temporary injunction, restraining the respondents from selling or transferring inherited agricultural land (approximately 2 hectares in Survey No. 40/2 at Khultabad). The court found sufficient prima facie evidence that the land was ancestral property subject to inheritance partition, and that respondents were attempting unauthorized transfers to third parties in violation of the petitioner's rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 96/2025 Petitioner: Jijabai Asaram Bomble Respondent: Eknath Kisan Dangorde Court: Khultabad, Maharashtra Date: 12/03/2026 Outcome: The petition was ALLOWED. The court granted the petitioner's application for temporary injunction, restraining the respondents from selling or transferring inherited agricultural land (approximately 2 hectares in Survey No. 40/2 at Khultabad). The court found sufficient prima facie evidence that the land was ancestral property subject to inheritance partition, and that respondents were attempting unauthorized transfers to third parties in violation of the petitioner's rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case