State of Maharashtra vs Ankush Mahadu Jadhav — 340/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAU100010002022
Filing Number
740/2022
Filing Date
16-Nov-2022
Registration No
340/2022
Registration Date
16-Nov-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad
Judge
1-Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
411
Police Station
Khultabad
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ankush Mahadu Jadhav
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court stopped proceedings against Ankush Mahadu Jadhav under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and discharged him, citing the prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite sufficient opportunities. The court found that continuing the case would serve no purpose and thus invoked Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code to terminate the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
08-Jan-2026
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
08-Sep-2025
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
25-Apr-2025
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
25-Oct-2024
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
23-Jul-2024
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
23-Apr-2024
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
13-Mar-2024
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
21-Dec-2023
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
19-Apr-2023
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
25-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 340/2022
The court stopped proceedings against Ankush Mahadu Jadhav under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and discharged him, citing the prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite sufficient opportunities. The court found that continuing the case would serve no purpose and thus invoked Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code to terminate the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts