Suvarna Anil Holkar vs Shobha Kisan Jadhav — 78/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU100007822025
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
11-08-2025
Filing Number
239/2025
Filing Date
12-08-2025
Registration No
78/2025
Registration Date
21-08-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad
Judge
1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC KHULTABAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suvarna Anil Holkar
Adv. BHAGADE SHARAD VITTHALRAO
Pawan Kisan Jadhav
Adv. BHAGADE SHARAD VITTHALRAO
Amruta Laxman Holkar
Adv. BHAGADE SHARAD VITTHALRAO
Rani Yogeshwar Sable
Adv. BHAGADE SHARAD VITTHALRAO
Respondent(s)
Shobha Kisan Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC KHULTABAD
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 78/2025 Summary: In this civil suit filed by Suvarna Anil Holkar (along with co-petitioners Pawan Kisan Jadhav and Amruta Laxman Holkar) against Shobha Kisan Jadhav, the Joint Civil Judge Junior Division, Khultabad, issued summons to the defendant on 28.08.2025, requiring her to appear, answer the claim, and file a written statement within 30 days. The court also issued a show-cause notice to the defendant regarding why temporary injunction (T.I.) should not be granted in favor of the plaintiff, and allowed emergency process and special relief upon payment of requisite fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 78/2025 Summary: In this civil suit filed by Suvarna Anil Holkar (along with co-petitioners Pawan Kisan Jadhav and Amruta Laxman Holkar) against Shobha Kisan Jadhav, the Joint Civil Judge Junior Division, Khultabad, issued summons to the defendant on 28.08.2025, requiring her to appear, answer the claim, and file a written statement within 30 days. The court also issued a show-cause notice to the defendant regarding why temporary injunction (T.I.) should not be granted in favor of the plaintiff, and allowed emergency process and special relief upon payment of requisite fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts