Raju S/o Mitthu Holkar vs Kantabai W/o Mitthu Holkar Advocate - Y.S. Pachlore — 100/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 38. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU100005672024
e-Filing Number
18-06-2024
Filing Number
197/2024
Filing Date
19-Jun-2024
Registration No
100/2024
Registration Date
19-Jun-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad
Judge
1-Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raju S/o Mitthu Holkar
Adv. UBALE PUNJARAM BAJIRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kantabai W/o Mitthu Holkar Advocate - Y.S. Pachlore
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 100/2024 Summary: The court granted Raju S/o Mitthu Holkar's petition to be included as a necessary party in the suit against Kantabai W/o Mitthu Holkar. The petitioner claimed that Respondent No. 1 sold disputed property to him based on a sale deed dated 27.03.2025 for ₹2,97,000, but the respondent concealed this transaction from the court. The court found the petitioner to be an essential party and directed him to be added as Respondent No. 3. The case was adjourned for the respondent to file a proper reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Compliance
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
26-Feb-2026
Order on Exh
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
05-Feb-2026
Order on Exh
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
29-Jan-2026
Order on Exh
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
17-Jan-2026
Order on Exh
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
06-Jan-2026
Order on Exh
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
12-Dec-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
21-Nov-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
16-Oct-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
19-Sep-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
20-Aug-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
24-Jul-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
26-Jun-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
26-Jun-2025
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
25-Jun-2025
Order on Exh
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
17-Jun-2025
Order on Exh
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
11-Apr-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
11-Apr-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
27-Mar-2025
Ex-Parte Order
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
03-Mar-2025
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
20-Feb-2025
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
07-Feb-2025
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
03-Jan-2025
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
06-Dec-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
22-Nov-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
17-Oct-2024
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
27-Sep-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
06-Sep-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
29-Aug-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
22-Aug-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
16-Aug-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
08-Aug-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
31-Jul-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
19-Jul-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.
-
21-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 100/2024
Case 100/2024 Summary: The court granted Raju S/o Mitthu Holkar's petition to be included as a necessary party in the suit against Kantabai W/o Mitthu Holkar. The petitioner claimed that Respondent No. 1 sold disputed property to him based on a sale deed dated 27.03.2025 for ₹2,97,000, but the respondent concealed this transaction from the court. The court found the petitioner to be an essential party and directed him to be added as Respondent No. 3. The case was adjourned for the respondent to file a proper reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts