State of Maharashtra vs Madhe Shivram Laxman — 145/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 239,177. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU100002862026

Filing Number

240/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

145/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad

Judge

2-CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Khultabad

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 239,177

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Madhe Shivram Laxman

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra vs Madhe Shivram Laxman (145/2026) The Judicial Magistrate discontinued proceedings against the accused Madhe Shivram Laxman under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code and discharged him. The court found that the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence, the matter remained pending without progress despite ample opportunities given to police and prosecution, and lacked sufficient substance to warrant continuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.m.f.c., Khultabad.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 145/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra vs Madhe Shivram Laxman (145/2026) The Judicial Magistrate discontinued proceedings against the accused Madhe Shivram Laxman under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code and discharged him. The court found that the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence, the matter remained pending without progress despite ample opportunities given to police and prosecution, and lacked sufficient substance to warrant continuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case