Yogesh Govindrao Vitkhede vs Prasad Bandu @ Bandurao @ Girjinath Vitkhede — 42/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU100002702022
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
84/2022
Filing Date
31-03-2022
Registration No
42/2022
Registration Date
31-03-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., KHULTABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yogesh Govindrao Vitkhede
Adv. Zalte S.C.
Rushikesh Govindrao Vitkhede
Respondent(s)
Prasad Bandu @ Bandurao @ Girjinath Vitkhede
Shaila Bandu @ Bandurao @ Girjinath Vitkhede
Shital Sandip Rokade
Sarika Dipak Bhagat
Sarita Yogesh Joshi
Chandrkant Baburao Vitkhede
Malti Anandrao Joshi
Prabhavati Digambarrao Kulkarni
Group Grampanchayat Verul Talawade
Saroj @ Rajani Vijayrrao Kulkarni
Suwarna Pramodrao Kulkarni
Shubhangi Sanjay Joshi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., KHULTABAD.
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 12-03-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 09-02-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 16-01-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 04-12-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 42/2022 Court: District Court, Khultabad, Aurangabad District, Maharashtra Date of Order: 20 June 2022 Parties: Petitioners Yogesh Govindrao Vitkhede and Rushikesh Govindrao Vitkhede vs. Respondents Prasad Bandu Vitkhede, Shaila Bandu Vitkhede, and Shital Sandip Rokade Subject Matter: Disputed ownership and possession of agricultural land (Survey No. 427, measuring 1,260 sq. ft. and 600 sq. ft.) in Khultabad, Aurangabad District. Outcome: The court allowed the petition under Section 5 (injunction) of the Code of Civil Procedure, directing the respondents to cease unlawful interference with the petitioner's property. The court found that the petitioner had established primary ownership through: (1) ancestral succession through deceased Govindrao Vitkhede, (2) consistent tax payment records, and (3) land revenue documentation. The court rejected the respondents' defense that the land division was incomplete, finding no valid legal basis for their claims. Costs of the petition were left to be determined later. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 42/2022 Court: District Court, Khultabad, Aurangabad District, Maharashtra Date of Order: 20 June 2022 Parties: Petitioners Yogesh Govindrao Vitkhede and Rushikesh Govindrao Vitkhede vs. Respondents Prasad Bandu Vitkhede, Shaila Bandu Vitkhede, and Shital Sandip Rokade Subject Matter: Disputed ownership and possession of agricultural land (Survey No. 427, measuring 1,260 sq. ft. and 600 sq. ft.) in Khultabad, Aurangabad District. Outcome: The court allowed the petition under Section 5 (injunction) of the Code of Civil Procedure, directing the respondents to cease unlawful interference with the petitioner's property. The court found that the petitioner had established primary ownership through: (1) ancestral succession through deceased Govindrao Vitkhede, (2) consistent tax payment records, and (3) land revenue documentation. The court rejected the respondents' defense that the land division was incomplete, finding no valid legal basis for their claims. Costs of the petition were left to be determined later. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts