Yogesh Govindrao Vitkhede vs Prasad Bandu @ Bandurao @ Girjinath Vitkhede — 42/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU100002702022

Steps_Unready

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

Filing Number

84/2022

Filing Date

31-03-2022

Registration No

42/2022

Registration Date

31-03-2022

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad

Judge

2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., KHULTABAD.

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 39
IA/1/2022 Classification : Commission Request Section Yogesh Govindrao VitkhedePrasad Bandu @ Bandurao @ Girjinath Vitkhede

Petitioner(s)

Yogesh Govindrao Vitkhede

Adv. Zalte S.C.

Rushikesh Govindrao Vitkhede

Respondent(s)

Prasad Bandu @ Bandurao @ Girjinath Vitkhede

Shaila Bandu @ Bandurao @ Girjinath Vitkhede

Shital Sandip Rokade

Sarika Dipak Bhagat

Sarita Yogesh Joshi

Chandrkant Baburao Vitkhede

Malti Anandrao Joshi

Prabhavati Digambarrao Kulkarni

Group Grampanchayat Verul Talawade

Saroj @ Rajani Vijayrrao Kulkarni

Suwarna Pramodrao Kulkarni

Shubhangi Sanjay Joshi

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C., KHULTABAD.

18-04-2026

Steps_Unready

12-03-2026

Steps_Unready

09-02-2026

Steps_Unready

16-01-2026

Steps_Unready

04-12-2025

Steps_Unready

Interim Orders

20-06-2022
Order on T.I.

Case Summary: 42/2022 Court: District Court, Khultabad, Aurangabad District, Maharashtra Date of Order: 20 June 2022 Parties: Petitioners Yogesh Govindrao Vitkhede and Rushikesh Govindrao Vitkhede vs. Respondents Prasad Bandu Vitkhede, Shaila Bandu Vitkhede, and Shital Sandip Rokade Subject Matter: Disputed ownership and possession of agricultural land (Survey No. 427, measuring 1,260 sq. ft. and 600 sq. ft.) in Khultabad, Aurangabad District. Outcome: The court allowed the petition under Section 5 (injunction) of the Code of Civil Procedure, directing the respondents to cease unlawful interference with the petitioner's property. The court found that the petitioner had established primary ownership through: (1) ancestral succession through deceased Govindrao Vitkhede, (2) consistent tax payment records, and (3) land revenue documentation. The court rejected the respondents' defense that the land division was incomplete, finding no valid legal basis for their claims. Costs of the petition were left to be determined later. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 42/2022 Court: District Court, Khultabad, Aurangabad District, Maharashtra Date of Order: 20 June 2022 Parties: Petitioners Yogesh Govindrao Vitkhede and Rushikesh Govindrao Vitkhede vs. Respondents Prasad Bandu Vitkhede, Shaila Bandu Vitkhede, and Shital Sandip Rokade Subject Matter: Disputed ownership and possession of agricultural land (Survey No. 427, measuring 1,260 sq. ft. and 600 sq. ft.) in Khultabad, Aurangabad District. Outcome: The court allowed the petition under Section 5 (injunction) of the Code of Civil Procedure, directing the respondents to cease unlawful interference with the petitioner's property. The court found that the petitioner had established primary ownership through: (1) ancestral succession through deceased Govindrao Vitkhede, (2) consistent tax payment records, and (3) land revenue documentation. The court rejected the respondents' defense that the land division was incomplete, finding no valid legal basis for their claims. Costs of the petition were left to be determined later. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case