Ratnakar Damodar Mhaske vs Kachru Laxman Mhaske — 26/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Amended Plaint. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU100002642024
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
e-Filing Number
18-03-2024
Filing Number
72/2024
Filing Date
19-03-2024
Registration No
26/2024
Registration Date
19-03-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad
Judge
1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC KHULTABAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ratnakar Damodar Mhaske
Adv. BHAGADE SHARAD VITTHALRAO
Dnyaneshwar Damodar Mhaske
Adv. BHAGADE SHARAD VITTHALRAO
Respondent(s)
Kachru Laxman Mhaske
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC KHULTABAD
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 23-04-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 09-04-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 23-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 12-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Civil Suit 26/2024 The court granted the petitioners' application to add necessary parties to the suit under CPC Rule 10. The application sought to include the heirs of the deceased Padmabai Chandrakant Madhikar as required parties, as she was the mother of plaintiffs 1 and 2 and defendants 2 and 3. The court found that given the nature of the dispute concerning independent possession and ownership rights, the heirs of the deceased were necessary parties to the suit. The case was adjourned for the plaintiffs to amend and refile the corrected plaint by the next hearing date of 23.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Civil Suit 26/2024 The court granted the petitioners' application to add necessary parties to the suit under CPC Rule 10. The application sought to include the heirs of the deceased Padmabai Chandrakant Madhikar as required parties, as she was the mother of plaintiffs 1 and 2 and defendants 2 and 3. The court found that given the nature of the dispute concerning independent possession and ownership rights, the heirs of the deceased were necessary parties to the suit. The case was adjourned for the plaintiffs to amend and refile the corrected plaint by the next hearing date of 23.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts