Ratnakar Damodar Mhaske vs Kachru Laxman Mhaske — 26/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Amended Plaint. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU100002642024

Amended Plaint

Next Hearing

02nd July 2026

e-Filing Number

18-03-2024

Filing Number

72/2024

Filing Date

19-03-2024

Registration No

26/2024

Registration Date

19-03-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad

Judge

1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC KHULTABAD

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section ORDER 39, RULE 1 AND 2

Petitioner(s)

Ratnakar Damodar Mhaske

Adv. BHAGADE SHARAD VITTHALRAO

Dnyaneshwar Damodar Mhaske

Adv. BHAGADE SHARAD VITTHALRAO

Respondent(s)

Kachru Laxman Mhaske

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC KHULTABAD

07-05-2026

Amended Plaint

23-04-2026

Amended Plaint

09-04-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

23-03-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

12-03-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

Interim Orders

21-03-2024
Order on T.I.
23-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Civil Suit 26/2024 The court granted the petitioners' application to add necessary parties to the suit under CPC Rule 10. The application sought to include the heirs of the deceased Padmabai Chandrakant Madhikar as required parties, as she was the mother of plaintiffs 1 and 2 and defendants 2 and 3. The court found that given the nature of the dispute concerning independent possession and ownership rights, the heirs of the deceased were necessary parties to the suit. The case was adjourned for the plaintiffs to amend and refile the corrected plaint by the next hearing date of 23.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Civil Suit 26/2024 The court granted the petitioners' application to add necessary parties to the suit under CPC Rule 10. The application sought to include the heirs of the deceased Padmabai Chandrakant Madhikar as required parties, as she was the mother of plaintiffs 1 and 2 and defendants 2 and 3. The court found that given the nature of the dispute concerning independent possession and ownership rights, the heirs of the deceased were necessary parties to the suit. The case was adjourned for the plaintiffs to amend and refile the corrected plaint by the next hearing date of 23.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case