Bhagitrabai Suryabhan Take vs Bhanudas Mhatarji Aute — 6/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU100000342023

Order on Exh

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

11/2023

Filing Date

07-01-2023

Registration No

6/2023

Registration Date

07-01-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad

Judge

1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC KHULTABAD

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 39

Petitioner(s)

Bhagitrabai Suryabhan Take

Adv. Kale D.P.

Respondent(s)

Bhanudas Mhatarji Aute

Subhash Bhimrao Aute

Eknath Laxman Malode

Ratan Laxman Malode(Legal Heir)

Rangnath Laxman Malode(Legal Heir) 5.

Shashikalabai Maldoe

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC KHULTABAD

28-03-2026

Order on Exh

18-03-2026

Order on Exh

17-03-2026

Order on Exh

12-03-2026

Citation

06-03-2026

Hearing

Interim Orders

28-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Bhagitrabai Suryabhan Take v. Bhanudas Mhatarji Aute Outcome: The court allowed the application for temporary injunction. The defendants are directed not to alienate the suit properties (three agricultural parcels in Aurangabad district) until the suit is disposed of. The judge found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case that the ancestral properties were illegally transferred to defendants during a 1976-77 consolidation scheme, and that the balance of convenience favors granting the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bhagitrabai Suryabhan Take v. Bhanudas Mhatarji Aute Outcome: The court allowed the application for temporary injunction. The defendants are directed not to alienate the suit properties (three agricultural parcels in Aurangabad district) until the suit is disposed of. The judge found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case that the ancestral properties were illegally transferred to defendants during a 1976-77 consolidation scheme, and that the balance of convenience favors granting the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case