Sominath Barku Dhivar vs State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Khultabad — 19/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU100000272026
e-Filing Number
14-01-2026
Filing Number
17/2026
Filing Date
16-Jan-2026
Registration No
19/2026
Registration Date
17-Jan-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad
Judge
1-Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sominath Barku Dhivar
Adv. Dinkar Punjaram Kale
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Khultabad
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 19/2026 Summary: The court dismissed Sominath Barku Dhivar's criminal application against the State of Maharashtra (Police Station Khultabad) under Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The dismissal was ordered because the applicant and his advocate were absent for an extended period, failed to take necessary steps to secure the respondent's presence despite the matter being pending, and showed no willingness to proceed with the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
11-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
05-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
30-Jan-2026
Reply/Say
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
27-Jan-2026
Reply/Say
Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad
-
19-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 19/2026
Case 19/2026 Summary: The court dismissed Sominath Barku Dhivar's criminal application against the State of Maharashtra (Police Station Khultabad) under Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The dismissal was ordered because the applicant and his advocate were absent for an extended period, failed to take necessary steps to secure the respondent's presence despite the matter being pending, and showed no willingness to proceed with the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts