Sunil Sahebrao Jadhav vs State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Khultabad — 10/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU100000232026

e-Filing Number

14-01-2026

Filing Number

14/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

10/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Khultabad

Judge

1-Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sunil Sahebrao Jadhav

    Adv. SHAIKH MAJID RAZZAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Khultabad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed Sunil Sahebrao Jadhav's application under Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to his failure to prosecute the case diligently. The applicant and his advocate were absent throughout proceedings, and despite the application being kept for dismissal on 11.02.2026, no steps were taken to secure the respondent's presence, demonstrating lack of willingness to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt. CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Khultabad

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Sunil Sahebrao Jadhav's application under Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to his failure to prosecute the case diligently. The applicant and his advocate were absent throughout proceedings, and despite the application being kept for dismissal on 11.02.2026, no steps were taken to secure the respondent's presence, demonstrating lack of willingness to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case