Raybhan Kisanrao Ughade vs Pratap Narayanrao Solanke Advocate - Pallod R.K. — 345/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1,Order39Rule1,2andSection151. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU090030912025
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
22-09-2025
Filing Number
893/2025
Filing Date
23-09-2025
Registration No
345/2025
Registration Date
25-09-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan
Judge
3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raybhan Kisanrao Ughade
Adv. Udawant K.P.
Respondent(s)
Pratap Narayanrao Solanke Advocate - Pallod R.K.
Kisan Asaram Jadhav
Adv. Pawar Vishnu B.
Kakasaheb Babasaheb Teke
Yogesh Babasaheb Solate
Khajoddin Mulla Sharfuddin Mulla
Mulla Riyazuddin Mulla Khajoddin
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 30-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 12-03-2026 | W.S. and Say |
| 03-02-2026 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
Case 345/2025 Summary: Plaintiff Raybhan Kisanrao Ughade's application for ad-interim injunction to restrain defendants from creating third party interests in suit property was rejected by the Civil Judge on 28/10/2025. The court found it inappropriate to grant the injunction without hearing the defendants first, noting that summons had already been issued and the underlying suit concerns declaration that sale-deeds executed by defendant No.1 are illegal and void due to false property boundaries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 345/2025 Summary: Plaintiff Raybhan Kisanrao Ughade's application for ad-interim injunction to restrain defendants from creating third party interests in suit property was rejected by the Civil Judge on 28/10/2025. The court found it inappropriate to grant the injunction without hearing the defendants first, noting that summons had already been issued and the underlying suit concerns declaration that sale-deeds executed by defendant No.1 are illegal and void due to false property boundaries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts