Farookh Bapulal Shaikh vs Bhaurao Yadav Nikam — 317/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU090029462025
e-Filing Number
18-09-2025
Filing Number
861/2025
Filing Date
19-Sep-2025
Registration No
317/2025
Registration Date
19-Sep-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan
Judge
3-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Farookh Bapulal Shaikh
Adv. Shaikh Azhar B.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bhaurao Yadav Nikam
Case History
-
08-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Apr-2026
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
27-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
12-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
18-Feb-2026
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
14-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
29-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
30-Oct-2025
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
20-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
In RCS No. 317/2025, the Civil Judge Jr. Division at Paithan ordered summons to be issued to defendant Bhaurao Yadav Nikam to appear and file a written statement within 30 days, with production of all relevant documents. The court also issued notice to the defendant regarding a temporary injunction (TI) prayer and directed him to show cause why the TI should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 317/2025
In RCS No. 317/2025, the Civil Judge Jr. Division at Paithan ordered summons to be issued to defendant Bhaurao Yadav Nikam to appear and file a written statement within 30 days, with production of all relevant documents. The court also issued notice to the defendant regarding a temporary injunction (TI) prayer and directed him to show cause why the TI should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts