State of Maharashtra vs Ahmad Ibrahim Shaikh — 440/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,413,147,148,149. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU090028182020

Filing Number

2478/2020

Filing Date

10-Dec-2020

Registration No

440/2020

Registration Date

10-Dec-2020

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan

Judge

4-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

138

Police Station

MIDC PAITHAN

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,413,147,148,149

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. Dhongade N.B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ahmad Ibrahim Shaikh

  2. 2.Siraj Dulekha Pathan

  3. 3.Raju Ahmad Shaikh

  4. 4.Khaja Ahmad Shaikh

  5. 5.Nisar Ahmad Shaikh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ahmad Ibrahim Shaikh and Others (440/2020) The court acquitted all five accused of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 149, 323, and 324 (rioting, criminal intimidation, and voluntarily causing hurt) based on insufficient evidence. Though the prosecution alleged the accused had assaulted the complainant and witnesses over a land boundary dispute on 26 June 2020, witness testimonies lacked credibility and failed to substantiate the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  7. 28-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  8. 25-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  9. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  10. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  11. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  12. 11-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  13. 22-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  14. 30-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  15. 19-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  16. 20-Sep-2024

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  17. 27-Jun-2024

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  18. 22-Apr-2024

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  19. 17-Jan-2024

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  20. 03-Nov-2023

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  21. 22-Aug-2023

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  22. 20-May-2023

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  23. 10-Mar-2023

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  24. 12-Dec-2022

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  25. 24-Aug-2022

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  26. 03-Jun-2022

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  27. 16-Mar-2022

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  28. 16-Nov-2021

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  29. 25-Jun-2021

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  30. 22-Dec-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 10-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 440/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ahmad Ibrahim Shaikh and Others (440/2020) The court acquitted all five accused of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 149, 323, and 324 (rioting, criminal intimidation, and voluntarily causing hurt) based on insufficient evidence. Though the prosecution alleged the accused had assaulted the complainant and witnesses over a land boundary dispute on 26 June 2020, witness testimonies lacked credibility and failed to substantiate the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case