State of Maharashtra vs Parshuram Gopichand Rathod — 436/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,34. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 30th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAU090025872022
Filing Number
2036/2022
Filing Date
03-Sep-2022
Registration No
436/2022
Registration Date
03-Sep-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan
Judge
3-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
344
Police Station
BIDKIN
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. Shimpi A.Y.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Parshuram Gopichand Rathod
-
2.Pritam Parshuram Rathod
-
3.Shubham Parshuram Rathod
-
4.Latabai Parshuram Rathod
Case History
-
30-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Apr-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
04-Apr-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
24-Feb-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
04-Feb-2026
EvidenceView PDF
This court order (RCC 436/2022) records witness testimony in a criminal case involving the State of Maharashtra against Parshuram Gopichand Rathod and others. The primary witness—a police officer who conducted the investigation—testified about finding an iron rod at the crime scene, preparing a panchnama (formal record), collecting medical certificates, and ultimately filing chargesheet against the accused for causing injuries to the complainant. During cross-examination, the witness made several damaging admissions, including that he may have fabricated evidence, prepared false medical certificates, and filed false charges despite no proof of assault emerging from his investigation. The court accepted these admissions on 04/02/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
01-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
18-Feb-2025
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
22-Nov-2024
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
15-Oct-2024
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
04-Sep-2024
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
09-Jul-2024
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
09-May-2024
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
28-Mar-2024
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
05-Feb-2024
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
15-Jan-2024
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
02-Dec-2023
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
10-Oct-2023
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
08-Sep-2023
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
27-Jul-2023
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
03-Jun-2023
Evidence
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
02-May-2023
Evidence
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
17-Mar-2023
N.B.W._Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
19-Jan-2023
N.B.W._Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
08-Nov-2022
Appearance
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
14-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 436/2022
This court order (RCC 436/2022) records witness testimony in a criminal case involving the State of Maharashtra against Parshuram Gopichand Rathod and others. The primary witness—a police officer who conducted the investigation—testified about finding an iron rod at the crime scene, preparing a panchnama (formal record), collecting medical certificates, and ultimately filing chargesheet against the accused for causing injuries to the complainant. During cross-examination, the witness made several damaging admissions, including that he may have fabricated evidence, prepared false medical certificates, and filed false charges despite no proof of assault emerging from his investigation. The court accepted these admissions on 04/02/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts