Shaikh Ajij Shaikh Usman vs Hurmatbee Shaikh Nawab — 288/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 8. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 13th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU090025222022
Filing Number
556/2022
Filing Date
29-Aug-2022
Registration No
288/2022
Registration Date
29-Aug-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan
Judge
4-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shaikh Ajij Shaikh Usman
Adv. Kakde P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Hurmatbee Shaikh Nawab
-
2.Shaik Nawab Shaikh Gulab(Legal Heir)
-
3.Suresh Dhondiram Chavan
-
4.Chandanabai Kashinath Gadekar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
In R.C.S. 288/2022, the Joint Civil Judge at Paithan disposed of the partition and possession suit by accepting the unconditional withdrawal of the case after the plaintiff (Shaikh Ajij) and Defendants 1-2 reached a settlement. The court found no substantial relief was sought against subsequent purchasers (Defendants 3-4), confirming the core dispute was between the plaintiff and Defendant No. 1, which was resolved through compromise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Disposed
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
04-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
12-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
21-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
19-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
07-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
04-Dec-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
17-Nov-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
04-Oct-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
06-Aug-2025
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
01-Aug-2025
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
23-Jul-2025
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
08-Jul-2025
Compromise
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
17-Apr-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
25-Feb-2025
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
13-Jan-2025
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
26-Nov-2024
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
16-Oct-2024
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
10-Sep-2024
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
29-Jul-2024
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
25-Jun-2024
Amended Plaint
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
30-Apr-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
15-Mar-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
24-Jan-2024
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
29-Nov-2023
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
10-Oct-2023
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
25-Aug-2023
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
19-Jul-2023
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
12-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
28-Mar-2023
Written Statement
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
24-Feb-2023
Written Statement
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
13-Jan-2023
Written Statement
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
21-Nov-2022
Written Statement
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
07-Oct-2022
Appearance
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
30-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 288/2022
In R.C.S. 288/2022, the Joint Civil Judge at Paithan disposed of the partition and possession suit by accepting the unconditional withdrawal of the case after the plaintiff (Shaikh Ajij) and Defendants 1-2 reached a settlement. The court found no substantial relief was sought against subsequent purchasers (Defendants 3-4), confirming the core dispute was between the plaintiff and Defendant No. 1, which was resolved through compromise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts