State of Maharashtra Through P.S MIDC Paithan vs suryabhan Bhika Pandit — 901226/2015
Case under Animal Preservation Act ( Maharashtra ) Section 11-1(a). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAU090024702015
Filing Number
902054/2015
Filing Date
03-10-2015
Registration No
901226/2015
Registration Date
03-10-2015
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan
Judge
4-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
Police Station
MIDC PAITHAN
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through P.S MIDC Paithan
Adv. Shimpi A.Y.
Respondent(s)
suryabhan Bhika Pandit
Hearing History
Judge: 4-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-01-2026 | Order |
| 01-11-2025 | Order |
| 08-09-2025 | Order |
| 18-07-2025 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Suryabhan Bhika Pandit (901226/2015) The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, citing two grounds: the Court's Authorized (C.A.) report was never filed despite the chargesheet being filed under Section 11(1)(A) of the Animal Cruelty Act, making further proceedings purposeless; and the case had remained pending without progress for over 11 years due to inability to secure the accused's presence through summons and warrant service. Seized materials were directed to MIDC Paithan Police Station for disposal as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Suryabhan Bhika Pandit (901226/2015) The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, citing two grounds: the Court's Authorized (C.A.) report was never filed despite the chargesheet being filed under Section 11(1)(A) of the Animal Cruelty Act, making further proceedings purposeless; and the case had remained pending without progress for over 11 years due to inability to secure the accused's presence through summons and warrant service. Seized materials were directed to MIDC Paithan Police Station for disposal as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts