Raju Sheshrao Rathod vs Ankush Shyama Rathod Advocate - Pallod R.K. — 269/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU090024532025

e-Filing Number

02-08-2025

Filing Number

693/2025

Filing Date

11-Aug-2025

Registration No

269/2025

Registration Date

11-Aug-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan

Judge

4-2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O39
Specific Relief Act Section 39
Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Raju Sheshrao Rathod

    Adv. Ghumare S.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ankush Shyama Rathod Advocate - Pallod R.K.

  2. 2.Shankar Shama Rathod

  3. 3.Sunil Jagan Rathod

  4. 4.Subhash Gabaru Rathod

  5. 5.Ramesh Gabaru Rathod

  6. 6.Sandip Jagan Rathod

  7. 7.Raju Hari Rathod

  8. 8.Ankush Dagadu Rathod

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  3. 12-Jan-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  4. 16-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  5. 14-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  6. 15-Sep-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Civil M.A. No. 269/2025 The court allowed the plaintiff's interim application and issued an injunction prohibiting defendants from creating any third-party interest in the disputed property (Gut No. 55/3, Kherda village) during pendency of the suit. The court found prima facie that the plaintiff established ownership through a registered gift deed from his father (who had purchased the property in 1978), and that defendants, currently in possession, lack valid documentation for their claims. The court rejected the defendants' limitation defense, noting that possession-based relief can be claimed within 12 years and that this issue requires full evidence. No interim relief regarding possession was granted, only the injunction against creating third-party interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 15-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  8. 08-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  9. 26-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  10. 14-Aug-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  11. 14-Aug-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  12. 14-Aug-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  13. 14-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  14. 12-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 11-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 269/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Civil M.A. No. 269/2025 The court allowed the plaintiff's interim application and issued an injunction prohibiting defendants from creating any third-party interest in the disputed property (Gut No. 55/3, Kherda village) during pendency of the suit. The court found prima facie that the plaintiff established ownership through a registered gift deed from his father (who had purchased the property in 1978), and that defendants, currently in possession, lack valid documentation for their claims. The court rejected the defendants' limitation defense, noting that possession-based relief can be claimed within 12 years and that this issue requires full evidence. No interim relief regarding possession was granted, only the injunction against creating third-party interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case