Raju Sheshrao Rathod vs Ankush Shyama Rathod Advocate - Pallod R.K. — 269/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU090024532025
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
02-08-2025
Filing Number
693/2025
Filing Date
11-08-2025
Registration No
269/2025
Registration Date
11-08-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan
Judge
4-2nd JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raju Sheshrao Rathod
Adv. Ghumare S.S.
Respondent(s)
Ankush Shyama Rathod Advocate - Pallod R.K.
Shankar Shama Rathod
Sunil Jagan Rathod
Subhash Gabaru Rathod
Ramesh Gabaru Rathod
Sandip Jagan Rathod
Raju Hari Rathod
Ankush Dagadu Rathod
Hearing History
Judge: 4-2nd JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 12-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 16-12-2025 | Issues |
| 14-10-2025 | Issues |
| 15-09-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Civil M.A. No. 269/2025 The court allowed the plaintiff's interim application and issued an injunction prohibiting defendants from creating any third-party interest in the disputed property (Gut No. 55/3, Kherda village) during pendency of the suit. The court found prima facie that the plaintiff established ownership through a registered gift deed from his father (who had purchased the property in 1978), and that defendants, currently in possession, lack valid documentation for their claims. The court rejected the defendants' limitation defense, noting that possession-based relief can be claimed within 12 years and that this issue requires full evidence. No interim relief regarding possession was granted, only the injunction against creating third-party interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Civil M.A. No. 269/2025 The court allowed the plaintiff's interim application and issued an injunction prohibiting defendants from creating any third-party interest in the disputed property (Gut No. 55/3, Kherda village) during pendency of the suit. The court found prima facie that the plaintiff established ownership through a registered gift deed from his father (who had purchased the property in 1978), and that defendants, currently in possession, lack valid documentation for their claims. The court rejected the defendants' limitation defense, noting that possession-based relief can be claimed within 12 years and that this issue requires full evidence. No interim relief regarding possession was granted, only the injunction against creating third-party interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts