Raju Sheshrao Rathod vs Ankush Shyama Rathod Advocate - Pallod R.K. — 269/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU090024532025

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

e-Filing Number

02-08-2025

Filing Number

693/2025

Filing Date

11-08-2025

Registration No

269/2025

Registration Date

11-08-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan

Judge

4-2nd JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section O39
Specific Relief Act Section 39
Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

Raju Sheshrao Rathod

Adv. Ghumare S.S.

Respondent(s)

Ankush Shyama Rathod Advocate - Pallod R.K.

Shankar Shama Rathod

Sunil Jagan Rathod

Subhash Gabaru Rathod

Ramesh Gabaru Rathod

Sandip Jagan Rathod

Raju Hari Rathod

Ankush Dagadu Rathod

Hearing History

Judge: 4-2nd JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN

12-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

12-01-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

16-12-2025

Issues

14-10-2025

Issues

15-09-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

15-09-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Civil M.A. No. 269/2025 The court allowed the plaintiff's interim application and issued an injunction prohibiting defendants from creating any third-party interest in the disputed property (Gut No. 55/3, Kherda village) during pendency of the suit. The court found prima facie that the plaintiff established ownership through a registered gift deed from his father (who had purchased the property in 1978), and that defendants, currently in possession, lack valid documentation for their claims. The court rejected the defendants' limitation defense, noting that possession-based relief can be claimed within 12 years and that this issue requires full evidence. No interim relief regarding possession was granted, only the injunction against creating third-party interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Civil M.A. No. 269/2025 The court allowed the plaintiff's interim application and issued an injunction prohibiting defendants from creating any third-party interest in the disputed property (Gut No. 55/3, Kherda village) during pendency of the suit. The court found prima facie that the plaintiff established ownership through a registered gift deed from his father (who had purchased the property in 1978), and that defendants, currently in possession, lack valid documentation for their claims. The court rejected the defendants' limitation defense, noting that possession-based relief can be claimed within 12 years and that this issue requires full evidence. No interim relief regarding possession was granted, only the injunction against creating third-party interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case