Abhijit Arvind Saraf vs Nandu Rambhau Dhaykar Advocate - धायकर आर.आर. — 226/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39,R1,2. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU090021112025
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
18-07-2025
Filing Number
621/2025
Filing Date
22-07-2025
Registration No
226/2025
Registration Date
23-07-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan
Judge
3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abhijit Arvind Saraf
Adv. Pahilwan D.J.
Arvind Kondopant Saraf
Respondent(s)
Nandu Rambhau Dhaykar Advocate - धायकर आर.आर.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 30-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 24-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 21-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 10-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Abhijit Arvind Saraf & Arvind Kondopant Saraf v. Nandu Rambhau Dhaykar The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favor of the plaintiffs on 30.07.2025. The plaintiffs, who own 0.50 hectares of agricultural land in Aurangabad, alleged the defendant obstructed their access to the property on 11.07.2025 despite having no relation to it. The court found prima facie evidence of plaintiffs' ownership through registered sale deeds and mutation entries, and accepted the police complaint confirming the obstruction. The defendant is restrained from obstructing plaintiffs' entry until his appearance in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Abhijit Arvind Saraf & Arvind Kondopant Saraf v. Nandu Rambhau Dhaykar The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favor of the plaintiffs on 30.07.2025. The plaintiffs, who own 0.50 hectares of agricultural land in Aurangabad, alleged the defendant obstructed their access to the property on 11.07.2025 despite having no relation to it. The court found prima facie evidence of plaintiffs' ownership through registered sale deeds and mutation entries, and accepted the police complaint confirming the obstruction. The defendant is restrained from obstructing plaintiffs' entry until his appearance in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts