Abhijit Arvind Saraf vs Nandu Rambhau Dhaykar Advocate - धायकर आर.आर. — 226/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39,R1,2. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU090021112025

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

e-Filing Number

18-07-2025

Filing Number

621/2025

Filing Date

22-07-2025

Registration No

226/2025

Registration Date

23-07-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan

Judge

3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section O39,R1,2

Petitioner(s)

Abhijit Arvind Saraf

Adv. Pahilwan D.J.

Arvind Kondopant Saraf

Respondent(s)

Nandu Rambhau Dhaykar Advocate - धायकर आर.आर.

Hearing History

Judge: 3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN

05-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

30-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

24-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

21-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

10-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Interim Orders

30-07-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Abhijit Arvind Saraf & Arvind Kondopant Saraf v. Nandu Rambhau Dhaykar The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favor of the plaintiffs on 30.07.2025. The plaintiffs, who own 0.50 hectares of agricultural land in Aurangabad, alleged the defendant obstructed their access to the property on 11.07.2025 despite having no relation to it. The court found prima facie evidence of plaintiffs' ownership through registered sale deeds and mutation entries, and accepted the police complaint confirming the obstruction. The defendant is restrained from obstructing plaintiffs' entry until his appearance in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Abhijit Arvind Saraf & Arvind Kondopant Saraf v. Nandu Rambhau Dhaykar The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favor of the plaintiffs on 30.07.2025. The plaintiffs, who own 0.50 hectares of agricultural land in Aurangabad, alleged the defendant obstructed their access to the property on 11.07.2025 despite having no relation to it. The court found prima facie evidence of plaintiffs' ownership through registered sale deeds and mutation entries, and accepted the police complaint confirming the obstruction. The defendant is restrained from obstructing plaintiffs' entry until his appearance in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case