Abhijit Arvind Saraf vs Nandu Rambhau Dhaykar Advocate - धायकर आर.आर. — 226/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39,R1,2. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU090021112025
e-Filing Number
18-07-2025
Filing Number
621/2025
Filing Date
22-Jul-2025
Registration No
226/2025
Registration Date
23-Jul-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan
Judge
3-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Abhijit Arvind Saraf
Adv. Pahilwan D.J.
-
2.Arvind Kondopant Saraf
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nandu Rambhau Dhaykar Advocate - धायकर आर.आर.
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
30-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
24-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
21-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
10-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
30-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
12-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
25-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
02-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
27-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
16-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
03-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
09-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
17-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
16-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
07-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
30-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
22-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
15-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
11-Sep-2025
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
02-Sep-2025
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
21-Aug-2025
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
04-Aug-2025
Appearance
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
30-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Abhijit Arvind Saraf & Arvind Kondopant Saraf v. Nandu Rambhau Dhaykar The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favor of the plaintiffs on 30.07.2025. The plaintiffs, who own 0.50 hectares of agricultural land in Aurangabad, alleged the defendant obstructed their access to the property on 11.07.2025 despite having no relation to it. The court found prima facie evidence of plaintiffs' ownership through registered sale deeds and mutation entries, and accepted the police complaint confirming the obstruction. The defendant is restrained from obstructing plaintiffs' entry until his appearance in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Jul-2025
Appearance
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
29-Jul-2025
Order on Exh
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
28-Jul-2025
Appearance
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
24-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 226/2025
Case Summary: Abhijit Arvind Saraf & Arvind Kondopant Saraf v. Nandu Rambhau Dhaykar The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favor of the plaintiffs on 30.07.2025. The plaintiffs, who own 0.50 hectares of agricultural land in Aurangabad, alleged the defendant obstructed their access to the property on 11.07.2025 despite having no relation to it. The court found prima facie evidence of plaintiffs' ownership through registered sale deeds and mutation entries, and accepted the police complaint confirming the obstruction. The defendant is restrained from obstructing plaintiffs' entry until his appearance in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts