State of Maharashtra vs Laxman Bajirao Nakhate — 962/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAU090019912024
Filing Number
1498/2024
Filing Date
30-Jul-2024
Registration No
962/2024
Registration Date
01-Aug-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan
Judge
3-CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
229
Police Station
PACHOD
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. Shimpi A.Y.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Laxman Bajirao Nakhate
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate terminated criminal proceedings against accused Laxman Bajirao Nakhate under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to the accused's prolonged absence and the prosecution's failure to file the required Cognizable Offence (C.A.) report despite one year's opportunity. The accused was discharged and the seized property was directed to be forwarded to the Excise Collector, Aurangabad for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
19-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
19-Jul-2025
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
17-Apr-2025
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
13-Feb-2025
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
04-Dec-2024
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
04-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 962/2024
The Judicial Magistrate terminated criminal proceedings against accused Laxman Bajirao Nakhate under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to the accused's prolonged absence and the prosecution's failure to file the required Cognizable Offence (C.A.) report despite one year's opportunity. The accused was discharged and the seized property was directed to be forwarded to the Excise Collector, Aurangabad for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts