Bhausaheb Narayan Raut vs Bhanudas Dada Sathe Advocate - Jagtap P.B. — 212/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU090019622024

Compliance

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

e-Filing Number

25-07-2024

Filing Number

503/2024

Filing Date

26-07-2024

Registration No

212/2024

Registration Date

29-07-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan

Judge

4-2nd JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

Bhausaheb Narayan Raut

Adv. Gorde R.B.

Raju Bhausaheb Raut

Mandabai Bhausaheb Raut

Ashwini Raju Raut

Respondent(s)

Bhanudas Dada Sathe Advocate - Jagtap P.B.

Mohankumar Shantaram Jadhav

Janardhan Bhausaheb Nawale

Santosh Gangadhar Nawale

Sainath Gangadhar Nawale

Mandabai Gangadhar Nawale

Tarabai Sanjay Aware

Hearing History

Judge: 4-2nd JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN

06-05-2026

Compliance

15-04-2026

Compliance

12-03-2026

Compliance

31-01-2026

Awaiting Report of Commissioner

01-01-2026

Awaiting Report of Commissioner

Interim Orders

29-04-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 212/2024 The court allowed the plaintiffs' application and appointed T.I.L.R. Paithan as Court Commissioner to measure agricultural land in gat numbers 16, 17, 18, and 19 at Village Imampur, Paithan, Aurangabad. The Commissioner must determine boundaries, identify any encroachment, and submit a report with map within one month. Both parties must equally bear measurement charges and comply with commission procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 212/2024 The court allowed the plaintiffs' application and appointed T.I.L.R. Paithan as Court Commissioner to measure agricultural land in gat numbers 16, 17, 18, and 19 at Village Imampur, Paithan, Aurangabad. The Commissioner must determine boundaries, identify any encroachment, and submit a report with map within one month. Both parties must equally bear measurement charges and comply with commission procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case