Rohit Vithal Tejinkar vs Vithal Dhondiram Tejinkar Advocate - Gorde R.B. — 124/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU090013442017
Filing Number
198/2017
Filing Date
16-Jun-2017
Registration No
124/2017
Registration Date
16-Jun-2017
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan
Judge
2-4th Jt CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rohit Vithal Tejinkar
Adv. Bhavar S.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vithal Dhondiram Tejinkar Advocate - Gorde R.B.
-
2.Yogesh Vitthal Tejinkar
-
3.Anil Vitthal Tejinkar
-
4.Tukaram Eknath Tejinkar
Case History
-
04-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Apr-2026
Issues
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
12-Mar-2026
Issues
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
20-Jan-2026
Issues
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
04-Dec-2025
Issues
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
30-Oct-2025
Issues
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
19-Sep-2025
Issues
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
16-Aug-2025
Issues
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
24-Jul-2025
Issues
4th Jt CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC
-
08-Jul-2025
Issues
4th Jt CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC
-
06-May-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Rohit Vithal Tejinkar v. Vithal Dhondiram Tejinkar & Others (Case 124/2017) Outcome: The court GRANTED the petitioner's application for temporary injunction (निशाणी नं. ०५) on 06.05.2025. Key Facts: Petitioner Rohit Vithal Tejinkar sought a temporary injunction to prevent defendants (Respondent 1 - an advocate, and Respondents 2, 3, 4) from selling or transferring disputed agricultural land in Bramhanwada, Paithan, Aurangabad. The petitioner claimed legal rights over the properties through his wife Ratna and their son Ronit, asserting the respondents unlawfully transferred ancestral joint family property to themselves without proper authority. Court's Finding: The court found prima facie case in petitioner's favor, determined balance of convenience favored the petitioner, and concluded irreparable injury would result without the injunction, therefore granted temporary injunction against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2025
Order on Exh
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
05-May-2025
Order on Exh
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
23-Apr-2025
Order on Exh
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
20-Mar-2025
Order on Exh
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
23-Jan-2025
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
09-Dec-2024
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
16-Oct-2024
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
23-Aug-2024
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
08-Jul-2024
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
02-May-2024
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
04-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
15-Feb-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
25-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
14-Dec-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
12-Oct-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
21-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
27-Jul-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
15-Jun-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
13-Apr-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
23-Mar-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
23-Feb-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
19-Jan-2023
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
22-Dec-2022
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
08-Dec-2022
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
03-Nov-2022
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
15-Sep-2022
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
11-Aug-2022
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
14-Jul-2022
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
23-Jun-2022
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
21-Apr-2022
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
24-Feb-2022
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
16-Dec-2021
Steps_Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
22-Oct-2021
Steps_Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
03-Sep-2021
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
16-Jul-2021
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
22-Apr-2021
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
25-Feb-2021
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
21-Jan-2021
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
11-Nov-2020
Steps
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
08-Sep-2020
Steps
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
20-Jun-2020
Steps
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
22-May-2020
Steps
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
04-May-2020
Steps
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
26-Mar-2020
Steps
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
30-Jan-2020
Steps
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
19-Dec-2019
Steps
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
10-Oct-2019
Steps
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
20-Aug-2019
Steps
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
19-Jun-2019
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
19-Mar-2019
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
08-Jan-2019
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
21-Nov-2018
Appearance
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
25-Oct-2018
Appearance
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
02-Jul-2018
Appearance
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
13-Apr-2018
Appearance
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
03-Mar-2018
Appearance
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
03-Feb-2018
Appearance
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
03-Jan-2018
Appearance
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
09-Dec-2017
Appearance
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
29-Nov-2017
Appearance
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
02-Nov-2017
Appearance
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
03-Oct-2017
Appearance
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
14-Sep-2017
Appearance
2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
17-Aug-2017
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
27-Jul-2017
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
29-Jun-2017
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
17-Jun-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jun-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 124/2017
Case Summary: Rohit Vithal Tejinkar v. Vithal Dhondiram Tejinkar & Others (Case 124/2017) Outcome: The court GRANTED the petitioner's application for temporary injunction (निशाणी नं. ०५) on 06.05.2025. Key Facts: Petitioner Rohit Vithal Tejinkar sought a temporary injunction to prevent defendants (Respondent 1 - an advocate, and Respondents 2, 3, 4) from selling or transferring disputed agricultural land in Bramhanwada, Paithan, Aurangabad. The petitioner claimed legal rights over the properties through his wife Ratna and their son Ronit, asserting the respondents unlawfully transferred ancestral joint family property to themselves without proper authority. Court's Finding: The court found prima facie case in petitioner's favor, determined balance of convenience favored the petitioner, and concluded irreparable injury would result without the injunction, therefore granted temporary injunction against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts