Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Ibrahim vs Nihal Jamil Shaikh Advocate - Pahilwan D.J. — 112/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU090009362025
e-Filing Number
24-03-2025
Filing Number
334/2025
Filing Date
26-Mar-2025
Registration No
112/2025
Registration Date
27-Mar-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan
Judge
3-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Ibrahim
Adv. Bhavar S.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nihal Jamil Shaikh Advocate - Pahilwan D.J.
-
2.Mudassir Jamil Shaikh
Adv. Pahilwan D.J.
-
3.Jamil Hafijur Raheman
Adv. Pahilwan D.J.
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
02-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
12-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
26-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
05-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
17-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
18-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
20-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
30-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
07-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
21-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
31-Jul-2025
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
17-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary (RCS 112/2025): Petitioner Shaikh Akbar's application for status-quo to prevent defendants' construction on his plot was rejected. The court found the pleadings too vague, as they failed to specify which side of the property the construction occurred or the area involved. The court also noted defendants have 30 days to file their written statement, making interim relief premature at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jul-2025
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
10-Jul-2025
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
03-Jul-2025
Notice_Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
26-Jun-2025
Notice_Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
03-Apr-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
03-Apr-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
03-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 112/2025
Case Summary (RCS 112/2025): Petitioner Shaikh Akbar's application for status-quo to prevent defendants' construction on his plot was rejected. The court found the pleadings too vague, as they failed to specify which side of the property the construction occurred or the area involved. The court also noted defendants have 30 days to file their written statement, making interim relief premature at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts