State of Maharashtra vs Abbas Transport Company — 338/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 239/177,194B(1). Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU090007172026

Filing Number

547/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

338/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan

Judge

4-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 239/177,194B(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. Shinde Apparao R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Abbas Transport Company

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate rejected the traffic violation case against Abbas Transport Company filed by the Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar Traffic Branch, holding that the police report was defective and did not constitute a valid chargesheet. The court found that critical details—including the place of offense, date of offense, and the actual driver's identity—were omitted, and only the vehicle owner was named without supporting documentation, making cognizance impossible under Section 226 of the B.N.S.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 338/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate rejected the traffic violation case against Abbas Transport Company filed by the Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar Traffic Branch, holding that the police report was defective and did not constitute a valid chargesheet. The court found that critical details—including the place of offense, date of offense, and the actual driver's identity—were omitted, and only the vehicle owner was named without supporting documentation, making cognizance impossible under Section 226 of the B.N.S.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case