State of Maharashtra vs Pawan Laxmanrao Aurange — 366/2026

Case under Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Comm Section 6(b),24. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU090006932026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

524/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

366/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan

Judge

4-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

436

Police Station

PAITHAN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Comm Section 6(b),24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. Shinde Apparao R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pawan Laxmanrao Aurange

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    PleaView PDF

    The court found the respondent, Pawan Laxmanrao Aurange, guilty under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012, Section 6(b) and Indian Penal Code Sections 215 and 252. The court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 200, with the fine amount to be given as compensation to the victim. The court's decision was based on evidence establishing the respondent's culpability in the charges brought by the State of Maharashtra. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 366/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the respondent, Pawan Laxmanrao Aurange, guilty under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012, Section 6(b) and Indian Penal Code Sections 215 and 252. The court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 200, with the fine amount to be given as compensation to the victim. The court's decision was based on evidence establishing the respondent's culpability in the charges brought by the State of Maharashtra. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case