State of Maharashtra vs Pawan Laxmanrao Aurange — 366/2026

Case under Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Comm Section 6(b),24. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU090006932026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

524/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

366/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan

Judge

4-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

FIR Details

FIR Number

436

Police Station

PAITHAN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Comm Section 6(b),24

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. Shinde Apparao R.

Respondent(s)

Pawan Laxmanrao Aurange

Hearing History

Judge: 4-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Plea

The court found the respondent, Pawan Laxmanrao Aurange, guilty under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012, Section 6(b) and Indian Penal Code Sections 215 and 252. The court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 200, with the fine amount to be given as compensation to the victim. The court's decision was based on evidence establishing the respondent's culpability in the charges brought by the State of Maharashtra. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the respondent, Pawan Laxmanrao Aurange, guilty under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012, Section 6(b) and Indian Penal Code Sections 215 and 252. The court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 200, with the fine amount to be given as compensation to the victim. The court's decision was based on evidence establishing the respondent's culpability in the charges brought by the State of Maharashtra. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case