Jayshree Vinodchandra Saraf vs Jagdish Rameshchandra Saraf Advocate - Shinde Y.R. — 78/2023
Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 37. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU090005862023
e-Filing Number
23-02-2023
Filing Number
142/2023
Filing Date
23-Feb-2023
Registration No
78/2023
Registration Date
23-Feb-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan
Judge
3-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jayshree Vinodchandra Saraf
Adv. Chavan Dhananjay
-
2.Sachin Vinodchandra Saraf
-
3.Nilesh Vinodchandra Saraf
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jagdish Rameshchandra Saraf Advocate - Shinde Y.R.
-
2.Shobha Jagdish Saraf
Adv. Shinde Y.R.
-
3.Vikas Ashok Pakhre
-
4.Jayshree Sopan Pakhre
-
5.Sunita Mahendra Saraf
Adv. Shinde Y.R.
-
6.Akashy Mahendra Saraf
Adv. Shinde Y.R.
-
7.Shweta Mahendra Saraf
Adv. Shinde Y.R.
-
8.Shila Shrikumar Shaha
-
9.Sandeep Pramodchandra Shroff
-
10.Swapnil Pramodchandra Shroff
-
11.Shashikalaben Nanubhai Javheri
-
12.Chhaya Alias Madalsaben Bhagwati Javheri
-
13.Vijayaben Pareshbhai Soni
-
14.Chandrakant Devidas Parekh
-
15.Jayshreeben Jayeshkumar Parikh
-
16.Hareshbhai Thakorlal Parekh
-
17.Dilipkumar Thakorlal Parekh
-
18.Mukeshbhai Thakorlal Parekh
-
19.Shilaben Narayanbhai Parekh
-
20.Alkaben Sunlibhai Parekh
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
12-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
10-Feb-2026
Order on T.I.View PDF
Case Summary: RCS No. 78/2023 Outcome: Application for temporary injunction rejected. The court dismissed the plaintiffs' request to restrain defendants from alienating agricultural property in Aurangabad, finding that the disputed land had already been partitioned among family members and was not joint family property. The court determined that after partition, the property became self-acquired property of Saraswatibai, who lawfully disposed of it to her grandsons. The court also found that plaintiffs suppressed material facts (admitting partition in a prior case RCS No. 80/2018) and failed to approach with clean hands, making defendants—not plaintiffs—entitled to protection from irreparable loss. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Feb-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
31-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
16-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
23-Dec-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
23-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
17-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
04-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
20-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
13-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
24-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
24-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
09-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
11-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
06-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
12-Nov-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
26-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
16-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
18-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
13-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
25-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
28-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
20-Feb-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
10-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
02-Dec-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
03-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
07-Oct-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
07-Oct-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
02-Sep-2023
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
14-Aug-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
15-Jul-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
12-Jun-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
02-May-2023
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
24-Apr-2023
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
24-Mar-2023
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
27-Feb-2023
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
24-Feb-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
24-Feb-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
24-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 78/2023
Case Summary: RCS No. 78/2023 Outcome: Application for temporary injunction rejected. The court dismissed the plaintiffs' request to restrain defendants from alienating agricultural property in Aurangabad, finding that the disputed land had already been partitioned among family members and was not joint family property. The court determined that after partition, the property became self-acquired property of Saraswatibai, who lawfully disposed of it to her grandsons. The court also found that plaintiffs suppressed material facts (admitting partition in a prior case RCS No. 80/2018) and failed to approach with clean hands, making defendants—not plaintiffs—entitled to protection from irreparable loss. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts