Raosaheb Mahadu Dharme vs NIL — 42/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED OTHERWISE on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU090002922026

e-Filing Number

20-01-2026

Filing Number

69/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

42/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan

Judge

4-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED OTHERWISE

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Raosaheb Mahadu Dharme

    Adv. Dharme S.S.

  2. 2.Demaji Mahadu Dharme

  3. 3.Parwatabai Laxman Tagre

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 42/2026 Summary The court partly allowed the application for a heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, declaring Raosaheb Mahadu Dharme, Demaji Mahadu Dharme, and Parwatabai Laxman Tagre as the Class-I legal heirs of deceased Anjanabai Mahadu Dharme. The court found no legal impediment after applicants submitted death certificates, Aadhar cards, and sworn affidavits, and no public objections were filed following newspaper notice. An heirship certificate was issued in the prescribed form, which serves for official purposes but confers no property rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Filing of Affidavit

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 42/2026 Summary The court partly allowed the application for a heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, declaring Raosaheb Mahadu Dharme, Demaji Mahadu Dharme, and Parwatabai Laxman Tagre as the Class-I legal heirs of deceased Anjanabai Mahadu Dharme. The court found no legal impediment after applicants submitted death certificates, Aadhar cards, and sworn affidavits, and no public objections were filed following newspaper notice. An heirship certificate was issued in the prescribed form, which serves for official purposes but confers no property rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case