Raosaheb Mahadu Dharme vs NIL — 42/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED OTHERWISE on 29th April 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU090002922026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

20-01-2026

Filing Number

69/2026

Filing Date

21-01-2026

Registration No

42/2026

Registration Date

21-01-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan

Judge

4-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN

Decision Date

29th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Raosaheb Mahadu Dharme

Adv. Dharme S.S.

Demaji Mahadu Dharme

Parwatabai Laxman Tagre

Respondent(s)

NIL

Hearing History

Judge: 4-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN

29-04-2026

Disposed

07-04-2026

Order on Exh

12-03-2026

Filing of Affidavit

22-01-2026

Filing of Affidavit

Final Orders / Judgements

29-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case 42/2026 Summary The court partly allowed the application for a heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, declaring Raosaheb Mahadu Dharme, Demaji Mahadu Dharme, and Parwatabai Laxman Tagre as the Class-I legal heirs of deceased Anjanabai Mahadu Dharme. The court found no legal impediment after applicants submitted death certificates, Aadhar cards, and sworn affidavits, and no public objections were filed following newspaper notice. An heirship certificate was issued in the prescribed form, which serves for official purposes but confers no property rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case 42/2026 Summary The court partly allowed the application for a heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, declaring Raosaheb Mahadu Dharme, Demaji Mahadu Dharme, and Parwatabai Laxman Tagre as the Class-I legal heirs of deceased Anjanabai Mahadu Dharme. The court found no legal impediment after applicants submitted death certificates, Aadhar cards, and sworn affidavits, and no public objections were filed following newspaper notice. An heirship certificate was issued in the prescribed form, which serves for official purposes but confers no property rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case