Bhausaheb Namdeo Pathade vs Baban Namdeo Pathade Advocate - Wakale S.S. — 29/2025

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 19-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU090001962025

e-Filing Number

20-01-2025

Filing Number

76/2025

Filing Date

20-Jan-2025

Registration No

29/2025

Registration Date

22-Jan-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan

Judge

5-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 6
Specific Relief Act Section 3437

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhausaheb Namdeo Pathade

    Adv. MULEY VIJAYKUMAR GULABRAO

  2. 2.Kamalgaon Bhausaheb Pathade

    Adv. MULEY VIJAYKUMAR GULABRAO

  3. 3.Krushna Bhausaheb Pathade

    Adv. MULEY VIJAYKUMAR GULABRAO

  4. 4.Sangita Gopichand Mapari

    Adv. MULEY VIJAYKUMAR GULABRAO

  5. 5.Yogita Ravindra Shelke

    Adv. MULEY VIJAYKUMAR GULABRAO

  6. 6.Anita Rajesh Shinde

    Adv. MULEY VIJAYKUMAR GULABRAO

  7. 7.Manisha Surendra Jagtap

    Adv. MULEY VIJAYKUMAR GULABRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Baban Namdeo Pathade Advocate - Wakale S.S.

  2. 2.Sumanbai Baban Pathade

  3. 3.Dr Rameshwar Baban Pathade

  4. 4.Kalpna Kailas Kuber

  5. 5.Ashwini Vasant Shinde

  6. 6.Ashok Baburao Bhand

  7. 7.Badrinath Baburao Bhand

  8. 8.Shivaji Vinayak Mapari

  9. 9.Gopichand Vinayak Mapari

  10. 10.Kaura Tulashiram Kuber

  11. 11.Meera Ashok Shelke

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 29/2025 Summary: The court issued an injunction restraining Respondent No. 13 from selling disputed ancestral property or constructing on half of the vacant plot, and ordered the property to be maintained in its present condition. The court found that the property was ancestral joint family property belonging to both the petitioners and respondents, and that Respondent No. 13's unauthorized sale would prejudice the petitioners' rights in the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  10. 08-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  11. 01-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  12. 14-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  13. 07-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  14. 09-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  15. 19-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  16. 19-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  17. 30-Jun-2025

    Reply/Say

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  18. 16-Jun-2025

    Reply/Say

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  19. 30-Apr-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  20. 21-Apr-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  21. 08-Apr-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  22. 27-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  23. 10-Feb-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  24. 23-Jan-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  25. 23-Jan-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  26. 23-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 20-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 29/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 29/2025 Summary: The court issued an injunction restraining Respondent No. 13 from selling disputed ancestral property or constructing on half of the vacant plot, and ordered the property to be maintained in its present condition. The court found that the property was ancestral joint family property belonging to both the petitioners and respondents, and that Respondent No. 13's unauthorized sale would prejudice the petitioners' rights in the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case