State of Maharashtra vs Ajim Shaikh Shabbir — 33/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 328,272,273,188. Disposed: Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT on 06th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAU090001532025
e-Filing Number
13-12-2024
Filing Number
99/2025
Filing Date
10-Jan-2025
Registration No
33/2025
Registration Date
13-Jan-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan
Judge
3-CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
450
Police Station
BIDKIN
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. Shimpi A.Y.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ajim Shaikh Shabbir
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary of Case 33/2025 (State of Maharashtra v. Ajim Shaikh Shabbir): The Judicial Magistrate committed the case to the Court of Sessions, Paithan, after finding that the accused was charged under IPC sections 272, 273, 328, 188 and Food Safety and Standards Act section 59. Since section 328 IPC charges are exclusively triable by the Sessions Court, commitment was necessary. The court directed production of case records and mudemal property by 02/05/2026 and notified the Public Prosecutor of commitment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
12-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
12-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
12-Aug-2025
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
02-May-2025
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
01-Apr-2025
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
01-Mar-2025
Appearance
CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan
-
13-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 33/2025
Summary of Case 33/2025 (State of Maharashtra v. Ajim Shaikh Shabbir): The Judicial Magistrate committed the case to the Court of Sessions, Paithan, after finding that the accused was charged under IPC sections 272, 273, 328, 188 and Food Safety and Standards Act section 59. Since section 328 IPC charges are exclusively triable by the Sessions Court, commitment was necessary. The court directed production of case records and mudemal property by 02/05/2026 and notified the Public Prosecutor of commitment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts