State of Maharashtra vs Ajim Shaikh Shabbir — 33/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 328,272,273,188. Disposed: Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT on 06th April 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU090001532025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

13-12-2024

Filing Number

99/2025

Filing Date

10-01-2025

Registration No

33/2025

Registration Date

13-01-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan

Judge

3-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN

Decision Date

06th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT

FIR Details

FIR Number

450

Police Station

BIDKIN

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 328,272,273,188
Food Safety and Standards Act,2006 Section 59

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. Shimpi A.Y.

Respondent(s)

Ajim Shaikh Shabbir

Hearing History

Judge: 3-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN

06-04-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

12-11-2025

Awaiting Summons

12-08-2025

Awaiting Summons

02-05-2025

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

06-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary of Case 33/2025 (State of Maharashtra v. Ajim Shaikh Shabbir): The Judicial Magistrate committed the case to the Court of Sessions, Paithan, after finding that the accused was charged under IPC sections 272, 273, 328, 188 and Food Safety and Standards Act section 59. Since section 328 IPC charges are exclusively triable by the Sessions Court, commitment was necessary. The court directed production of case records and mudemal property by 02/05/2026 and notified the Public Prosecutor of commitment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 33/2025 (State of Maharashtra v. Ajim Shaikh Shabbir): The Judicial Magistrate committed the case to the Court of Sessions, Paithan, after finding that the accused was charged under IPC sections 272, 273, 328, 188 and Food Safety and Standards Act section 59. Since section 328 IPC charges are exclusively triable by the Sessions Court, commitment was necessary. The court directed production of case records and mudemal property by 02/05/2026 and notified the Public Prosecutor of commitment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case