Rukhmini Ravasaheb Chintamani vs nil — 13/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU090000532026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-01-2026

Filing Number

22/2026

Filing Date

03-01-2026

Registration No

13/2026

Registration Date

03-01-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan

Judge

3-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Rukhmini Ravasaheb Chintamani

Adv. Chavan V.R.

Mangal Nanasaheb Lavhat

Sangita Gajanan Khapre

Respondent(s)

nil

Hearing History

Judge: 3-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C. PAITHAN

12-03-2026

Disposed

18-02-2026

Evidence

13-02-2026

Evidence

05-01-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Evidence
12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted the petition of Rukhmini Ravasaheb Chintamani, Mangal Nanasaheb Lavhat, and Sangita Gajanan Khapre for a succession certificate, recognizing them as the sole legal heirs of the deceased Ravasaheb Vinay Chintamani (who died on 21/11/2025). The court found that the petitioners submitted adequate documentary evidence including death certificates, affidavits, and supporting documents, with no objections received after public notice, establishing their exclusive entitlement to the succession certificate for daily financial transactions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

18-02-2026
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the petition of Rukhmini Ravasaheb Chintamani, Mangal Nanasaheb Lavhat, and Sangita Gajanan Khapre for a succession certificate, recognizing them as the sole legal heirs of the deceased Ravasaheb Vinay Chintamani (who died on 21/11/2025). The court found that the petitioners submitted adequate documentary evidence including death certificates, affidavits, and supporting documents, with no objections received after public notice, establishing their exclusive entitlement to the succession certificate for daily financial transactions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case