Vishwanath Vithoba Gadhekar vs Nil — 6/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Status: Documents. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Documents Next hearing 24-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU090000102026

e-Filing Number

01-01-2026

Filing Number

10/2026

Filing Date

01-Jan-2026

Registration No

6/2026

Registration Date

01-Jan-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Paithan

Judge

4-2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vishwanath Vithoba Gadhekar

    Adv. Muley V.G.

  2. 2.Ramesh Vishwanath Gadhekar

  3. 3.Shivnath Vishwanath Gadhekar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nil

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Documents

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Documents

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary - Civil M.A. No. 06/2026 The applicants (husband and two sons) sought a heirship certificate for property and a bank account registered in the name of the mother/deceased woman. The court held that since the property constitutes absolute property of the woman, heirship cannot be determined without first ascertaining the title and source of the property. The court directed the applicants to produce all relevant documents on record for proper verification before deciding the heirship claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Documents

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Documents

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C. Paithan

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  8. 02-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 01-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - Civil M.A. No. 06/2026 The applicants (husband and two sons) sought a heirship certificate for property and a bank account registered in the name of the mother/deceased woman. The court held that since the property constitutes absolute property of the woman, heirship cannot be determined without first ascertaining the title and source of the property. The court directed the applicants to produce all relevant documents on record for proper verification before deciding the heirship claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case