Gulsher Kha Ahemad Kha vs Yakub Kha Gulam Rasul Kha — 387/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Awaiting Report of Commissioner. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU080044282024
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
e-Filing Number
12-09-2024
Filing Number
1674/2024
Filing Date
18-09-2024
Registration No
387/2024
Registration Date
18-09-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod
Judge
3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD J.M.F.C., SILLOD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gulsher Kha Ahemad Kha
Adv. Ahemad Anees
Shaikh Humairabi Shaikh Nisar
Adv. AHMED ANEES RAFEEQUE AHMAD ZUBEDA BEGUM
Shamim Kha Ahemad Kha Pinjari
Adv. AHMED ANEES RAFEEQUE AHMAD ZUBEDA BEGUM
Respondent(s)
Yakub Kha Gulam Rasul Kha
Abbas Kha Gulam Rasul Kha
Rashid Kha Inayam Ulla Kha
Aziz Kha Inayat Ulla Kha
Sakinabi Aziz Kha Pinjari
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD J.M.F.C., SILLOD
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Awaiting Report of Commissioner |
| 27-04-2026 | Awaiting Report of Commissioner |
| 25-03-2026 | Awaiting Report of Commissioner |
| 12-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 26-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - R.C.S./387/2024 The plaintiff's application for extension of time to deposit Court Commissioner fees was rejected as premature. The court found that although the Deputy Superintendent's office had not issued a formal letter due to technical error, the plaintiff was present in court and had opportunity to deposit the fees before office hours. The court directed the plaintiff to deposit the fees immediately rather than grant an extension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - R.C.S./387/2024 The plaintiff's application for extension of time to deposit Court Commissioner fees was rejected as premature. The court found that although the Deputy Superintendent's office had not issued a formal letter due to technical error, the plaintiff was present in court and had opportunity to deposit the fees before office hours. The court directed the plaintiff to deposit the fees immediately rather than grant an extension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts