Heena Kausar Shaikh Javed vs Javed Chotu Shaikh Advocate - Deshpande A.V. — 27/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12(A). Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHAU080036672024
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
14-06-2024
Filing Number
1002/2024
Filing Date
14-06-2024
Registration No
27/2024
Registration Date
20-06-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod
Judge
3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD J.M.F.C., SILLOD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Heena Kausar Shaikh Javed
Adv. Pathan I.I.
Respondent(s)
Javed Chotu Shaikh Advocate - Deshpande A.V.
Nafisa Begamshaikh Chotu
Shaikh Chotu Shaikh Yusuf
Shaikh Aaves Shaikh Chotu
Heena Shaikh Aaves
Salman Shaikh Chotu
Muskan Shaikh Salman
Farhan Shaikh Chotu
Aaisha Shaikh Farhan
Nilofar Shaikh Altaf
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD J.M.F.C., SILLOD
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 29-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 21-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 02-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: PWDVA 27/2024 Heena Kausar Shaikh Javed v. Javed Chotu Shaikh The court allowed the application to set aside a no-say order with costs of Rs. 1,000 imposed on the non-applicants. The court found that the non-applicants deliberately failed to file their response to the interim maintenance application filed on 14/06/2024, despite being given ample opportunity and having filed their written statement to the main application on 20/02/2025. The no-say order is set aside, and non-applicants are directed to file their say on the interim maintenance application by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: PWDVA 27/2024 Heena Kausar Shaikh Javed v. Javed Chotu Shaikh The court allowed the application to set aside a no-say order with costs of Rs. 1,000 imposed on the non-applicants. The court found that the non-applicants deliberately failed to file their response to the interim maintenance application filed on 14/06/2024, despite being given ample opportunity and having filed their written statement to the main application on 20/02/2025. The no-say order is set aside, and non-applicants are directed to file their say on the interim maintenance application by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts