Ajijbee Habeebkha Pathan vs State of Maharashtra — 844/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU080035002025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

24-12-2025

Filing Number

1532/2025

Filing Date

24-12-2025

Registration No

844/2025

Registration Date

24-12-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod

Judge

6-IIIRD JT CJJD AND JMFC SILLOD

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Ajijbee Habeebkha Pathan

Adv. Mandlecha V.I.

Rabibkha Habeebkha Pathan

Adv. Mandlecha V.I.

Rais Habeebkha Pathan

Adv. Mandlecha V.I.

Said Habeeb Pathan

Adv. Mandlecha V.I.

Hamid Habeebkha Pathan

Adv. Mandlecha V.I.

Heena Habeeb Pathan

Adv. Mandlecha V.I.

Aasma Sandu Shaikh

Adv. Mandlecha V.I.

Pathan Shameenabee Najir Khan

Adv. Mandlecha V.I.

Sayma Musa Shaikh

Adv. Mandlecha V.I.

Shabanabee Shaikh Irfan

Adv. Mandlecha V.I.

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 6-IIIRD JT CJJD AND JMFC SILLOD

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

18-02-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 844/2025 The court partially allowed the petition filed by Ajijbee Habeebkha Pathan and others against the State of Maharashtra. The court found merit in the petitioners' challenge to certain orders and directed the remittance of the warrant amount under the Mumbai Regulations, 1287, Section 8, while setting aside orders that violated statutory provisions and procedural requirements. The court held that the respondent's actions lacked proper legal justification under the applicable regulatory framework. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 844/2025 The court partially allowed the petition filed by Ajijbee Habeebkha Pathan and others against the State of Maharashtra. The court found merit in the petitioners' challenge to certain orders and directed the remittance of the warrant amount under the Mumbai Regulations, 1287, Section 8, while setting aside orders that violated statutory provisions and procedural requirements. The court held that the respondent's actions lacked proper legal justification under the applicable regulatory framework. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case