Tarabai Kautik Davne vs State Of Maharashatra — 5/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 01st April 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU080034832025
e-Filing Number
23-12-2025
Filing Number
1517/2025
Filing Date
23-12-2025
Registration No
5/2026
Registration Date
02-01-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod
Judge
3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD J.M.F.C., SILLOD
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tarabai Kautik Davne
Adv. Sayyad R.S.
Kalyani Kautik DaneRepresented by Guardian - Tarabai Kautik Davne
Adv. Sayyad R.S.
Satyam Kautik DavneRepresented by Guardian - Tarabai Kautik Davne
Adv. Sayyad R.S.
Laxmi Kisan Davne
Adv. Sayyad R.S.
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashatra
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE JD J.M.F.C., SILLOD
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Public Notice/Proclamation
First Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-01-2026 | Public Notice/Proclamation |
| 03-01-2026 | First Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 5/2026 The court approved the petitioners' application for a succession certificate under the Bombay Regulation, 1827. The deceased, Koutik Davne, died on 26/08/2025, leaving four legal heirs: petitioner 1 (wife), petitioner 2 (daughter), petitioner 3 (son), and petitioner 4 (mother). The court found all documentary evidence and public notices valid, with no objections raised. The petition was granted, and the heirs were directed to pay requisite court fees for issuance of the succession certificate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 5/2026 The court approved the petitioners' application for a succession certificate under the Bombay Regulation, 1827. The deceased, Koutik Davne, died on 26/08/2025, leaving four legal heirs: petitioner 1 (wife), petitioner 2 (daughter), petitioner 3 (son), and petitioner 4 (mother). The court found all documentary evidence and public notices valid, with no objections raised. The petition was granted, and the heirs were directed to pay requisite court fees for issuance of the succession certificate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts