Bhausaheb Mukundrao Daund vs State of Maharashtra — 840/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2and3. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU080034552025

e-Filing Number

19-12-2025

Filing Number

1504/2025

Filing Date

20-Dec-2025

Registration No

840/2025

Registration Date

23-Dec-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod

Judge

4-Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2and3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhausaheb Mukundrao Daund

    Adv. Panpatil V.U.

  2. 2.Mankarnabai Mukund Daund

    Adv. Panpatil V.U.

  3. 3.Rekhabai Tukaram Tayde

    Adv. Panpatil V.U.

  4. 4.Nirmala Dinkarrao Patil

    Adv. Panpatil V.U.

  5. 5.Sarla Ankush More

    Adv. Panpatil V.U.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 840/2025 Summary The court granted the petition and issued a succession certificate to petitioners Bhausaheb Mukundrao Daund, Mankarnabai Mukund Daund, and Rekhabai Tukaram Tayde as the legal heirs of the deceased Mukunda Ramchandra Daund (died 27.10.2025). The court found that the petitioners' claims were substantiated by affidavits, witness evidence, death certificate, and public notices published in newspapers without any objections, establishing them as the deceased's lawful heirs under the Mumbai Act 1827. The certificate shall be issued after payment of prescribed court fees and judicial stamp duty, but cannot be used for claiming benefits under the Indian Succession Act 1925 or obtaining heir certificates under Maharashtra Court Fees Act 1959. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod

  10. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod

  12. 24-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  13. 24-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 20-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 840/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 840/2025 Summary The court granted the petition and issued a succession certificate to petitioners Bhausaheb Mukundrao Daund, Mankarnabai Mukund Daund, and Rekhabai Tukaram Tayde as the legal heirs of the deceased Mukunda Ramchandra Daund (died 27.10.2025). The court found that the petitioners' claims were substantiated by affidavits, witness evidence, death certificate, and public notices published in newspapers without any objections, establishing them as the deceased's lawful heirs under the Mumbai Act 1827. The certificate shall be issued after payment of prescribed court fees and judicial stamp duty, but cannot be used for claiming benefits under the Indian Succession Act 1925 or obtaining heir certificates under Maharashtra Court Fees Act 1959. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case