Geetabai Ganesh Gayake vs State of Maharashtra — 810/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 28th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU080033952025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

16-12-2025

Filing Number

1483/2025

Filing Date

17-12-2025

Registration No

810/2025

Registration Date

19-12-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod

Judge

4-IIND JT.C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C., SILLOD

Decision Date

28th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Geetabai Ganesh Gayake

Adv. Kalam K.S.

Kaishalya Krushna Kakde

Adv. Kalam K.S.

Ganesh Krushna KakdeRepresented by Guardian - Kaishalya Krushna Kakde

Adv. Kalam K.S.

Pooja Rajendra Badak

Adv. Kalam K.S.

Kalyani Sonaji Badak

Adv. Kalam K.S.

Nikita Vishal Shelke

Adv. Kalam K.S.

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 4-IIND JT.C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C., SILLOD

28-03-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

Arguments

23-03-2026

Arguments

17-03-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

28-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted the petitioners' application for a succession certificate under the Mumbai Act 1827, establishing that petitioners 1-6 are the legal heirs of the deceased Eknath Bala Kakde. The court found the petitioners' claims substantiated by documentary evidence and witness testimony, with no opposing objections filed, and issued the succession certificate for use in government and semi-government matters, while clarifying it does not confer ownership of immovable property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the petitioners' application for a succession certificate under the Mumbai Act 1827, establishing that petitioners 1-6 are the legal heirs of the deceased Eknath Bala Kakde. The court found the petitioners' claims substantiated by documentary evidence and witness testimony, with no opposing objections filed, and issued the succession certificate for use in government and semi-government matters, while clarifying it does not confer ownership of immovable property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case