Sultana Begam Shaikh Kamal Ahmed vs State of Maharashtra — 780/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU080031022025
e-Filing Number
25-11-2025
Filing Number
1341/2025
Filing Date
26-11-2025
Registration No
780/2025
Registration Date
28-11-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod
Judge
4-IIND JT.C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C., SILLOD
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sultana Begam Shaikh Kamal Ahmed
Adv. Pathan M.Y.
Shaikh Jahed Kamal Ahmed
Adv. Pathan M.Y.
Shahin Bi Saiyyad Sharif
Adv. Pathan M.Y.
Shaikh Shahed Ahmed Shaikh Kamal Ahmed
Adv. Pathan M.Y.
Nasrin Begam Shaikh Azhar
Adv. Pathan M.Y.
Shaikh Mujahid Ahmed Mo Kamal Ahmed
Adv. Pathan M.Y.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 4-IIND JT.C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C., SILLOD
Disposed
Arguments
Evidence Part Heard
Public Notice/Proclamation
Public Notice/Proclamation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 19-01-2026 | Public Notice/Proclamation |
| 12-01-2026 | Public Notice/Proclamation |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted the petition filed by Sultana Begam and others for an heir certificate, establishing them as the legal heirs of the deceased Md. Kamal Md. Isa (who died on 16.02.2006) under the Mumbai Act 1827. The court found that the petitioners' claims were substantiated by documentary evidence and sworn statements, with no objections raised during the prescribed notice period. The heir certificate was ordered to be issued to facilitate government and semi-government benefits for the legitimate heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court granted the petition filed by Sultana Begam and others for an heir certificate, establishing them as the legal heirs of the deceased Md. Kamal Md. Isa (who died on 16.02.2006) under the Mumbai Act 1827. The court found that the petitioners' claims were substantiated by documentary evidence and sworn statements, with no objections raised during the prescribed notice period. The heir certificate was ordered to be issued to facilitate government and semi-government benefits for the legitimate heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts