Pooja Gorkshanath SaKhale vs State of Maharashtra — 701/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU080028372025

e-Filing Number

31-10-2025

Filing Number

1185/2025

Filing Date

03-Nov-2025

Registration No

701/2025

Registration Date

03-Nov-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod

Judge

6-Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pooja Gorkshanath SaKhale

    Adv. Gulve S.Y.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

  2. 2.Ratnkalabai Krushna Sakhale

    Adv. Ingle K.U.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed the petition filed by Pooja Gorkshanath Sakhale against the State of Maharashtra and Ratnkalabai Krushna Sakhale. The court found that the respondent violated procedural requirements under the Mumbai Regulation 1987 and applicable inheritance laws, and directed the respondent to comply with proper legal procedures regarding the disputed matter. The petitioner's rights were upheld based on deficiencies in the respondent's compliance with statutory obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  8. 04-Mar-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  9. 04-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  10. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  11. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  12. 28-Jan-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  13. 27-Jan-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  14. 27-Jan-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  15. 20-Jan-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  16. 16-Jan-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  17. 09-Jan-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  18. 03-Jan-2026

    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  19. 30-Dec-2025

    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  20. 16-Dec-2025

    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  21. 08-Dec-2025

    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  22. 04-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  23. 04-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 03-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 701/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition filed by Pooja Gorkshanath Sakhale against the State of Maharashtra and Ratnkalabai Krushna Sakhale. The court found that the respondent violated procedural requirements under the Mumbai Regulation 1987 and applicable inheritance laws, and directed the respondent to comply with proper legal procedures regarding the disputed matter. The petitioner's rights were upheld based on deficiencies in the respondent's compliance with statutory obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case