Pooja Gorkshanath SaKhale vs State of Maharashtra — 701/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 30th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU080028372025
e-Filing Number
31-10-2025
Filing Number
1185/2025
Filing Date
03-11-2025
Registration No
701/2025
Registration Date
03-11-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod
Judge
6-IIIRD JT CJJD AND JMFC SILLOD
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pooja Gorkshanath SaKhale
Adv. Gulve S.Y.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Ratnkalabai Krushna Sakhale
Adv. Ingle K.U.
Hearing History
Judge: 6-IIIRD JT CJJD AND JMFC SILLOD
Disposed
Arguments
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 04-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the petition filed by Pooja Gorkshanath Sakhale against the State of Maharashtra and Ratnkalabai Krushna Sakhale. The court found that the respondent violated procedural requirements under the Mumbai Regulation 1987 and applicable inheritance laws, and directed the respondent to comply with proper legal procedures regarding the disputed matter. The petitioner's rights were upheld based on deficiencies in the respondent's compliance with statutory obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court allowed the petition filed by Pooja Gorkshanath Sakhale against the State of Maharashtra and Ratnkalabai Krushna Sakhale. The court found that the respondent violated procedural requirements under the Mumbai Regulation 1987 and applicable inheritance laws, and directed the respondent to comply with proper legal procedures regarding the disputed matter. The petitioner's rights were upheld based on deficiencies in the respondent's compliance with statutory obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts